28 and being older than our CB is the point.
We don't need young CB at this point, a guy at that age still has solid 5 years in him. Cubarsi is 17 (almost 18) and even though he is the definition of an early bloomer he shows lack of experience a lot. Having Inigo beside him showed the importance of experience.
Kounde is RB at this point, Eric Garcia is being shown the door, Araujo and Christensen are both injury prone with only one more season left. Inigo will be 34 and will either leave this summer or next. We don't have a CB ready to step up from La Masia (it doesn't seem they see Mbacke that way, to my disappointment).
We will need to sign at least one CB by summer 2026, ideally two. Cubarsi/Araujo are the only ones who should stay beyond summer 2026. Christensen is a maybe.
In what world are we set?
He's 29 in 2 months btw.
Key is to sign hungry players, not the ones looking for nice weather and last payday. Heck, even in Lever forum they comment wishing him all the best and that he enjoys the life at sunny Barcelona and beaches nearby.
3 others are - Araujo, Cuba, Inigo.
Even without Christiansen in equation we're set. Yeah. There's also Faye potentially.
1) Point is: let's say we want Tah to replace just Inigo (ideal case)
If Inigo is not leaving THIS summer, it's already too many CBs for 2 spots: Christensen, Cubarsi, Araujo, Inigo, Tah is 5 CBs
No top team has 5 CBs for 2 spots. Even 4 on the same level is something no top team does.
Ideally you need 3 on the same level, and a 4th that knows he is only rotation option.
2) Apart from the immediate problems.
Long-term, it makes 0 sense to invest on Tah, when you can renew Christensen and Araujo who are both BETTER than him.
It's a simply point.
I can justify this signing if the club knows FOR SURE that either Christensen or Araujo are 100% LEAVING this summer or next.
From leaks and everything, I don't see that
3) I don't even mention Kounde, because he is not an RB and he will be replaced sooner or later by a real RB.
Then he won't settle for a mere sub at RB. He will have to go back to CB rotation
More congestion, more people fighting for 2 spots
Bad squad planning persists, and it's all on Deco and Laporta
1) Ideally, you have healthy players. When you don't, you plan based on that.
As said in previous post: Cubarsi is a kid, Christensen is shot, Araujo injury history is scary. Inigo is a 50-50 to stay, and that is a question for only one more year. We have to either address one CB this year, or two next year.
We aren't renewing Christensen, and we are pushing him out, leaks already started about selling him in January, but surgery ended it. Who knows if he is even going to be the same player after the injury.
Kounde is a RB, and won't be replaced any time soon. Kounde isn't RB is the new Mascherano isn't a CB, Or Roberto isn't a RB.
Players change positions, and even if they don't like it, they usually stay there. A story as old as football itself. Alaba wanting to be CDM, Kimmich wanting to be a CDM, etc. Kounde is a RB in both NT, and club, under Deschamps, Xavi & Flick. He is a short, who is no longer quivk and mistake prone. He will never became a world class CB. The day we replace him as RB (won't happen before 2027) he will be put on the market.
You yourself ask for the club to show balls and sign Lewandowski replacement, and force him to accept that.
But when we are trying to do the same in CB, address a position of need and show the door for players with no availability, you are complaining.
I am neutral about Tah himself btw, didn't watch him enough to have a strong opinion about him.
But getting a new CB who is ready to compete is important and needed. To show Christensen and Eric the door, and get leverage over Araujo during renewal negotiations.
PS: Tah is Flick's request. Deco is making a move to support the coach for 2nd time
Unless the club knows something serious, we don't know, about Christensen's long-term health, it makes 0 sense
Christensen >>> Tah, so the whole strategy of pushing him out makes 0 sense again
As for Kounde, whole logic is flawed. Mascherano was great as CB in our system, Alaba was great as CB in Flick's Bayern, etc.
Point is: players change positions IF IT WORKS
The fact that we had a gap in RB, and were packed in CBs, and some thought 'OK let's play Kounde at RB'
doesn't change the fact that
1) Kounde has n't proven to be a good RB (the contrary, and lately more and more see it)
2) Kounde hasn't proven that he STOPPED being a good CB that he was until 2022 (Against what you say)
PS: Won't change my mind on Deco because Flick requested the player (if that is true).
He shows YET AGAIN he should NOT be the SD of Barcelona
Or we can go for RB. I don't mind.'OK let's play Kounde at RB'
Unless the club knows something serious, we don't know, about Christensen's long-term health, it makes 0 sense
Christensen >>> Tah, so the whole strategy of pushing him out makes 0 sense again
As for Kounde, whole logic is flawed. Mascherano was great as CB in our system, Alaba was great as CB in Flick's Bayern, etc.
Point is: players change positions IF IT WORKS
The fact that we had a gap in RB, and were packed in CBs, and some thought 'OK let's play Kounde at RB'
doesn't change the fact that
1) Kounde has n't proven to be a good RB (the contrary, and lately more and more see it)
2) Kounde hasn't proven that he STOPPED being a good CB that he was until 2022 (Against what you say)