28 and being older than our CB is the point.
We don't need young CB at this point, a guy at that age still has solid 5 years in him. Cubarsi is 17 (almost 18) and even though he is the definition of an early bloomer he shows lack of experience a lot. Having Inigo beside him showed the importance of experience.
Kounde is RB at this point, Eric Garcia is being shown the door, Araujo and Christensen are both injury prone with only one more season left. Inigo will be 34 and will either leave this summer or next. We don't have a CB ready to step up from La Masia (it doesn't seem they see Mbacke that way, to my disappointment).
We will need to sign at least one CB by summer 2026, ideally two. Cubarsi/Araujo are the only ones who should stay beyond summer 2026. Christensen is a maybe.
In what world are we set?
If you read again I didn't even mention Eric, he is irrelevant
1) Point is: let's say we want Tah to replace just Inigo (ideal case)
If Inigo is not leaving THIS summer, it's already too many CBs for 2 spots: Christensen, Cubarsi, Araujo, Inigo, Tah is 5 CBs
No top team has 5 CBs for 2 spots. Even 4 on the same level is something no top team does.
Ideally you need 3 on the same level, and a 4th that knows he is only rotation option.
2) Apart from the immediate problems.
Long-term, it makes 0 sense to invest on Tah, when you can renew Christensen and Araujo who are both BETTER than him.
It's a simply point.
I can justify this signing if the club knows FOR SURE that either Christensen or Araujo are 100% LEAVING this summer or next.
From leaks and everything, I don't see that
3) I don't even mention Kounde, because he is not an RB and he will be replaced sooner or later by a real RB.
Then he won't settle for a mere sub at RB. He will have to go back to CB rotation
More congestion, more people fighting for 2 spots
Bad squad planning persists, and it's all on Deco and Laporta