Stric
New member
The mutual consent story is a way to save what's left of their dignity in front of the public. Unfortunately for them, the people are smart enough to know he was sacked because he was unsuccessful.
- Status
The mutual consent story is a way to save what's left of their dignity in front of the public. Unfortunately for them, the people are smart enough to know he was sacked because he was unsuccessful.
ceefoo
New member
El Gato
Villarato!
If it was a sack he'd get 20mln to his pocket. Therefore it isn't, therefore your argument is invalid.
Stric
New member
I'm not saying it wasn't mutual consent officially, obviously it is because of the contract termination and the money. I'm just saying they did it that way to save what's left of their reputation. By the way, how exactly would any of them benefit from a classic sacking? This way, Mourinho is not as humiliated as he could have been, and the club gets to keep the 20 mil. It's a well-designed strategy to keep everyone happy. You're saying that as if Mourinho's exit doesn't have anything to do with how bad he was. He's leaving, that is, the contract was terminated, that is, he's sacked, because he wasn't successful. They did it with mutual consent to favor both parties as much as possible. Are you actually implying that this is not the reason he's leaving?
ShandyFFM
New member
the best and the worst thing that could happened madrid was mourinho..if they would have loved him like chelski or inter he could have done amazing things but now hes gone crazy and made a bigger mess out of madrid than it was before.im glad he leaving cause only klopp and pep got his class and both are not possible for madrid
yeeees i hate them from deeep down haha visca barca
yeeees i hate them from deeep down haha visca barca
El Gato
Villarato!
That escalated quickly.
Contracts are bound by law you know. You can't just assume because they said otherwise in the media they could keep their 20mln they were bound by contract to pay out in the event of termination. So no, it's not a sack, it's mutual agreement, on paper. But why do I care, you can call it whatever you want.
He was successful, but not as successful as everyone thought he would be. He messed with the club's mentality and paid the price. There still are positive sides to his campaign. I'm still grateful he helped us to overcome the European barriers and got us to beat you lot on a regular basis. He fucked up and lost his chances for the Decima. Too bad.
evilhita666
Barçapocalypse NOW!
Not going to miss him at all... Hopefully the "war" ambient between Barca and Madrid of the last years is gone forever, I love the rivalry but at a certain point it became too much...
Stric
New member
Did you even bother to read my post?
I am aware this is a real, official termination with mutual consent. However, it would not have happened if he had been more successful. Therefore, the entire thing (the contract termination, that is, him leaving) happened because of his "lack" of success. None of this would have happened had he been more successful. Therefore, he was sacked. Not in the way you'd imagine when hearing that word, but yeah, he is still the one leaving, on account of his lousy performance.
Clockwise
Buccaneer
wish you'd stayed.- Status
Home of Barca Fans
