Neymessi
Active member
So luck had no effect on us winning the league?
No. I mean the no-no making it a yes.
So luck had no effect on us winning the league?
You think explained I think making excuses when caught out speaking shite.
Each to their own.
Okay.
Why did you ask if I was from India?
No. I mean the no-no making it a yes.
Would have still won the league cause the other teams underperformed.
Haha gone from 'mostly luck' to no luck involved.
Bit of form for flip flopping opinions now.
Bit of a reading omprehension issue I would say. No to his no made it a yes.
So luck had effect on us winning the league but we'd still win it if we weren't lucky?
I struggle here.
Haha the irony in that sentence.
A yes to his question means no luck involved anyway....
Since I started it, I'll explain.What is their to struggle?
You are being needlessly pedantic about luck. We ended at 93 points. Didn't deserve to end up so high. And this point tally is misleading. I am not belittling our win, I am a fan myself why would I? What I am saying is, for the 100th time, to not think that we don't have MASSIVE problems because we won the league with 14 points difference.
Do you disagree with my last line?
So Barca won 'mostly due to luck' but infact would have won the league without luck.
Good that is all sorted...
On paper, yes the double is impressive, but its mostly luck. If we play exactly like we did this season next season and RM, atletico decide to not be shitty and our luck runs out we aren't going to win anything. So its not like all is fine because we got a double. We should just be thankful we won the double by being so shit and work to change our shit next season.
So perfect that you are semantically pedantic. Lets say we won the league without luck by fnish 2 points above? What changes? After this shitload of essays of the last few pages written between us, you should go back to my first post where I said
Conveniently ignoring the main pount and pedantically making it all about something else.
Since I started it, I'll explain.
You say: it's not true that luck had no effect on us winning the league meaning (1) luck had effect on us winning the league. Winning is the key word here. Later on, you claim, (2) if it wasn't for luck, we'd still win it due to some reasons.
(1) and (2) contradict themselves.
Now that we sorted it out, I do.
We have problems. Never denied that.
I'd much rather discuss our problems than luck.
Nah your just flip flopping opinion again.
Form for that then trying to explain what REALLY meant.