Kylian Mbappé

[El Gato]

Lads, just cuz even Real Madrid ran rings around you all, it doesn't make him any less quality.

Kylian is da man for giving the doubters a little spank for being naughty. Deserved 4 or 5 provided how active he was and how motivated he was to lead his team relatively decimated by injuries upfront.

 

[SmilerBam]

Lads, just cuz even Real Madrid ran rings around you all, it doesn't make him any less quality.

Kylian is da man for giving the doubters a little spank for being naughty. Deserved 4 or 5 provided how active he was and how motivated he was to lead his team relatively decimated by injuries upfront.

You rang rings with VAR that s right.And where was this incredible Mbappe in the latter stages of CL last year, against teams that don't defend like 10 years old schoolboys?

 

[krakdol]

You rang rings with VAR that s right.And where was this incredible Mbappe in the latter stages of CL last year, against teams that don't defend like 10 years old schoolboys?

Mbappe was coming back from injury in the late stages of CL, so clearly not at his best.

 

[El Gato]

@Smilie
You seem upset

Don't be upset

Smile

 

[SmilerBam]

@Smilie
You seem upset

Don't be upset

Smile

You seem happy.And an another rival forum, maybe banned.I know you are happy, but maybe have respect that you post on a rivals forum?Just saying.Edit.I don t give many fucks about current Barca or even the current football climate.But i can t let a rival shit on my team,no matter what.

 

[El Gato]

Banned? I think this forum might be too broken for that. Besides Barcaman wouldn't ban considering I would have an excuse for not being here when Atalanta put 6 past Madrid next week

I'm not shitting on your team. Or at the very least I don't intend to. Nor am I alone. Lots o people would point out you got boinked by the Benzemas, the Vazquezs, the Vinicius' and the Marianos. If anything it does make the point of Mbappe good performance slightly weaker. So take your pick. You're either happy RM ran rings around you cuz it lets you think Mbappe is shit, or you're upset about it meaning it was at least somewhat of an achievement and Mbappe is pretty decent. Not like he wasn't before that.

Tho I guess both are kinda true?
Hmm. Might need to rethink that.

 

[krakdol]

And suddenly he is worldclass again because he played well against us. dont get me wrong he is a good player but before this match started he didnt do well. Playing well against us is nothing special.

Fucking coutinho with bayern looked wordclass against us.

He has always been world class, there's a reason he's world #1 in player value. He won the World Cup half by himself...

 

[Barcilliant]

Haaland is better than Mbappe.

 

[Respekt_III]

Y'all still think he is overrated?

yes massively overrated.

 

[SmilerBam]

Banned? I think this forum might be too broken for that. Besides Barcaman wouldn't ban considering I would have an excuse for not being here when Atalanta put 6 past Madrid next week

I'm not shitting on your team. Or at the very least I don't intend to. Nor am I alone. Lots o people would point out you got boinked by the Benzemas, the Vazquezs, the Vinicius' and the Marianos. If anything it does make the point of Mbappe good performance slightly weaker. So take your pick. You're either happy RM ran rings around you cuz it lets you think Mbappe is shit, or you're upset about it meaning it was at least somewhat of an achievement and Mbappe is pretty decent. Not like he wasn't before that.

Tho I guess both are kinda true?
Hmm. Might need to rethink that.

You said Mbappe is pretty decent.I think that too.He is a really good footballer.But 1.He is surely not the second coming of Ronaldo Nazario.I argue that he is not even at the level Neymar that was at Barca.2.A good performance against this shambles of a team is nothing to brag about.Actually, every decent footballers these days must throw stones to their head if he doesn't cause problems to Barcelona.

 

[El Gato]

Nobody will be a Ronaldo Nazario because defenses don't play like they did for Ronaldo Nazario.

I know this is partly a coping mechanism, but yeah, he's very good. Sorry. You have Fati anyway who's apparently as good or etter so whats the bother.

 

[SmilerBam]

Nobody will be a Ronaldo Nazario because defenses don't play like they did for Ronaldo Nazario.

I know this is partly a coping mechanism, but yeah, he's very good. Sorry. You have Fati anyway so whats the bother.

Defenses were much better and physical during Ronaldo's prime.Not a coping mechanism at all, i don t care about Mbappe, i just don t think he is on par talent wise with the greatest players ever,like he is compared too.Fati?Another overated player.Great finishing, but that s about it.Maybe i am too pretentious, but i really saw much better prospects than Mbappe and Fati.

 

[El Gato]

Oh you do care. Elsewise you'd not continue the chat for the mere need to defend legends of the game from disparaging claims Mbappe may be up there with them. And what's more, you care cuz he's not likely going to end up up your street.

Defenses weren't necessarily better at all either. Those today get away with a lot less than those pre age of cameras.

 

[SmilerBam]

Oh you do care. Elsewise you'd not continue the chat for the mere need to defend legends of the game from disparaging claims Mbappe may be up there with them. And what's more, you care cuz he's not likely going to end up up your street.

Defenses weren't necessarily better at all either. Those today get away with a lot less than those pre age of cameras.

They weren't better?Look at the individuals consisting the top defences in the 90's and 2000's.And yes, i don t care about Mbappe.He ll go to Real?Good, he s no Cristiano either.What i care is my own opinions and my own eyes:i ve seen too many incredible players to be bamboozled by the likes of Mbappe.If you believe it or not, it's your own preference.I have no reason to lie.

 

[El Gato]

They weren't better?Look at the individuals consisting the top defences in the 90's and 2000's.

That's the point here mate. Defenders, whoever they were Maldini, Baresi or others, were allowed to do more to stop attackers hence less goals. Refs more lenient as would come under less scrutiny from journalists and fans who didn't have access to photographic evidence of their mistakes.