Yea, but to me, he looks like he does not really care about the players he deems as not needed for his plan. That makes said players feel like shit and it is not something worthy of a true gentleman. He behave badly with Eto'o imo, and when the guy went on to score in Pep's first clasico, in the CL quarters and even in the final -- a huge goal, that opened the road for us against United -- he tought Pep a bit of a lesson (see his celebration after the goal from Olimpico).
And he still sold him for Ibra (one of the worst deals in the clubs history, I bet if we had Eto'o in 2010 we would've repeated the CL probably, instead we had Bojan and Ibra in the middle of a feud with Pep). Pep and his actions after 2009 had a major involvement in us not doing better in 2010. Getting KOed in the Cup by Sevilla after getting beaten at home 2-1, and by an overachieving Inter side in Champions League.
Now, Pep is a huge managerial figure in our history, but still, his media-image is made with skill, not with honesty (unlike Lucho). The main difference between Mourinho and Pep is that Pep knows better how to keep some things under the rug. But make no mistakes, Pep and Mourinho have a lot of things in common. Both are dictators and both get into conflicts to impose their will. Pep might be more civil and might control himself better in public, but he is not necessarily kinder when off the spotlight.