@BBZ Isn't it tyring to keep repeating the same false narratives, strawmens and red herrings that were pointed out and debunked many times again and again?
Ok, I'll tell you a secret now.
Sit down.
Numbers used in this story are just numbers to explain the idea, so don't take them literally.
Here is WHY Barca won during Pep and why we CAN'T win anymore with THAT style.
1. let's say that in early 2000s:
-- Barca had technique 90 out of 100
-- and physique 50/100, as always since we didn't rely on physique
Other teams had different combinations. Some relied on technique (like Real) while English and Italian teams relied more on physique back then.
The key thing is that the level of football was lower back then and NO TEAM had BOTH technique and physique.
Let's say that Barca had 90 technique and 50 physique.
Italian teams had 80 physique and 75 technique.
English teams had 90 physique and 70 technique etc.
So, back then, you could have won in 2 ways:
1. with high technique and average physique
2. or with high physique and average-good technique
When Rijkaard came, we improved our technique to let's say 95/100 and physique to let's say 70/100.
That was the most physical Barca till that moment.
When Pep came, he invented some new tricks in terms of technique, and he elevated our technique (paired with Messi-Xavi-Iniesta individual magic) to let's say unreal levels: 120/100.
During Pep, our technique was 120, and our physique was weaker than under Rijkaard, let's say that it was around 60/100 level.
But, another key thing is: our opponents back then weren't as physical as today.
English teams had let's say: 90/100 physique and 70/100 technique.
Bayern, Juve the same.
So, why we won under Pep?
1. we had the best individuals ever: Messi, Xavi, Iniesta
2. we had an awesome coach
3. Pep elevated our technique to out of this world levels (level 120)
4. we had a huge advantage over our European opponents in terms of technique
5. our opponents were shocked and didn't know how to neutralize us in the first 2-3 years
6. our opponents haven't yet adopted our technical tricks into their gamestyle
But then, look what happened 10 years later, today:
Barca had technique 120 under Pep.
Today we dropped to let's say 90.
We had physique 60 under Pep, we are still shit and we still have average physique (athleticism, muscles and height).
BUT, this is a KEY:
Let's say Bayern:
-- during 2008-2012, Bayern had technique let's say 80 and physique 90.
But look what happened:
-- after Barca's success, they even hired Pep and adopted a lot of our Tiki-Taka, pressing, movement, technical tricks.
So, Bayern elevated their technical game from 80 to let's say 110.
And even worse, they evolved even in physical area.
They were already dominant in a physical area 10 years ago, but now they reached robot levels and have physique like 110/100.
Now, let's repeat key moments one more time:
1. during Pep, we had technique 120 due to unreal individual talent (Messi, Xavi, Iniesta) paired with technical ideas of Pep who were revolutionary back then.
-- NO ONE knew how to stop us in the first 3 years
-- and NO ONE was able to copy us and implement OUR ideas into their system
So, in a simplified words: we had technique 120 and all other top teams in the world had technique 80-90.
So, we had an unreal technical advantage.
THIS IS WHY we were able to win WITHOUT physique.
Our technical domination was so large that we didn't suffer due to our historically physically lighter footballing approach.
Even though, it needs to be said, even Pep's Barca 2008-2012 struggled in majority of ties against physical teams (Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Chelsea 2012 and only one true win against RM in 2011).
Now, if we fast forward to 2020, people here talk nonsense all the time how we need to go back to Pep's style and how we can dominate again, lol.
As explained above:
1. we can never again reach 120 technical level since we will never again have Messi, Xavi, Iniesta individual magic
2. we can't have an advantage of Pep's era when the opponents were shocked by our game and when they didn't have the answer
3. and last, majority of big teams like Real, Bayern, Liverpool, City have copied basics of Pep's game so, the advantage can't be 120 versus 90 in technique since they are using THE SAME TRICKS as we do
And paired with PHYSIQUE:
1. we always had the weakest physique in Europe, let's say 60/100.
2. 10 years ago, Bayern and English teams had physique let's say 85/100
But they evolved insanely in the last 10 years and Bayern and Liverpool have a team of robots who can run like crazy for 90 minutes for 60 matches per season.
-- their wingers are fast
-- their wingers can press, cover and defend
-- their attackers are both fast, tall (headers) and technical
-- their midfield is fast, strong, technical, hardworking
-- their CBs are faster and more modern than our guys
-- their fullbacks are way faster, way taller (defending against corners and crosses) and equally as technical (or even better)
So, basically:
Pep's Barca played against Bayern and Liverpool who had technique 85/100 and physique 85/100.
And today those top teams elevated their skills to: technique 110/100 and physique 120/100.
While our technique dropped to 90 and our physique is around 60/100 roughly.
No wonder that the same happened to: Barca, Pep's teams after Barca, Spanish NT, Brasilian NT.
All those teams (except Pep's City) rely mostly ONLY on technique, IQ and how to outsmart the opponents with technique, dribbles and movement.
None of these teams are too athletic (except Pep's City).
Now, some of you may reply: BUT BUT BUT, if we improve our technique, we could dominate again.
The answer is: NO.
As said: a huge part of our success was:
1. individual talent (Messi, Xavi, Iniesta).
= we can't repeat it, so we can never reach Pep's heights
2. teams were shocked by Pep's style back then.
= teams aren't shocked anymore, lol. They had 12 years to learn it inside out
= so, if we would play a carbon copy of Pep's style, it wouldn't have nowhere near the same impact as in 2008-2011
3. teams back then hadn't implement yet OUR STYLE into their game
= today, everyone implemented our basics
Now, let's go to our future team:
-- our winger is Trincao= in general, unless if he improves to Figo's levels, we will be weaker than top teams who have faster wingers
-- Fati, the same
-- Puig in the middle, lol. Imagine Puig vs Bayern's midfield
-- let's go to fullbacks: Dest. Way slower than modern fullbacks from Bayern or Liverpool.
How will Trincao+Dest defend against 2 faster guys from Bayern?
-- Eric Garcia, the same. Liverpool has 190 or 195 tall robots in defense, who can intercept, tackle, bully, win aerial duels easily.
We will have a good guy, slowish Eric Garcia who is neither athletic nor fast.
-- now, let's move to defending corners and crosses against Bayern and Liverpool.
Imagine our team when half of our lineup is: Puig, Garcia, Dest, Fati.
Bayern has the whole team with height 185-190.
And then you will have Puig, Dest and co jumping with 185cm guys.
We will have 3-4 good jumpers.
Bayern will have 8 or 10.
What to do then?
You will reply: but but but, Pep didn't need height because we had possession all the time.
Again, you can't repeat that trick again because teams were shocked by TikiTaka back then, they didn't know how to defend and take the ball away, plus they didn't implement our tricks into their game.
All in all, I would raise serious IQ questions towards guys who don't understand how the football has evolved and how far we are left behind.
And how much we will need to improve.
Yet, we are moving backwards, and our hope are fckng coach Xavi and Puig as a playmaker.
Xavi will aim for 80% sterile possession, play 165cm midfielders and whine how the grass was 2 milimeters too high.
Our future looks awesome, lol.
And it will stay the same as long as people will believe: Pep's style is still the way to go and we shouldn't ever change our style, we are Barca.
Well, in that case, we will have the same faith as Ac Milan from 90s, Brasilian NT and similar.
Teams who were the best in their time, but who were eaten by time since they haven't evolved towards modern ideas.