khaled_a_d
Senior Member
He's going to be the next young striker from Ligue 1 going for a huge fee. He or Lacazette, or both.
It will be him since Lacazette will be 25 by summer so he isn't gonna be young striker
He's going to be the next young striker from Ligue 1 going for a huge fee. He or Lacazette, or both.
He's going to be the next young striker from Ligue 1 going for a huge fee. He or Lacazette, or both.
No. He is good but not a futur star. His stupid intervention cost a penalty against his team after a good goal. Neither Lacazette in fact. A good striker, but not the same potential than a Fekir, Martial or Ntep.
Just picked up his 8th goal of the season giving him the loan lead as Ligue 1's top scorer. His fee will be steep if he keeps this up.
edit: Added an assist. 8 goals, 3 assist on the season.
Not calling Batshuayi up because he isn't in form but selecting Origi who - at that time - hadn't started a single game shows exactly how subjective Wilmots is.Never gets called up for the national team.. so weird. Then again, Wilmots.
Not calling Batshuayi up because he isn't in form but selecting Origi who - at that time - hadn't started a single game shows exactly how subjective Wilmots is.
I worry at times that this will affect Michy's motivation to play for Belgium
How comes that he was ignored by Belgium NT for so long time if Batshuayi's that good?
Just wondering because I haven't watched him Before...
Thank you for the explanationWilmots prefers strikers like Benteke, target-men so to speak who occupy the centerback and create room for the attacking midfielders. Batshuayi is a different sort of striker.