Who the hell is Bagnack?
Who the hell is Bagnack?
Because Samper plays there, and he's betterI know I am not the coach but why the heck isn't Bagnack playing as DM? He is quite reminiscent of Busquets. Technically, he is the best in the team, IMO.
Because Samper plays there, and he's better
Keep lying to yourself. . . . From what I have seen over both matches played Samper doesn't even come 20ft close. Made a bunch of terrible passes too.
I watched the game live. Those Spurs fan are brilliant, has to be said.
Missed the first 10mins or so but our 2 wide boys were super impressive. Samper was bossing aswell and Bagnack, who the Tottenham fans behind me were calling Song, was top notch.
Sandro looking super clinical.
They did well though first half. There number 20 is decent and i thought the number 8 who came on as a sub was looking good aswell.
Hard to figure out what Samper is going to be best at because he lacks the speed to really be a traditional holding midfielder
Must've been fun to catch a glimpse of the kids up close like that in a nice venue like WHL...How did Londoners appreciate the blaugrana kids?
I did hear them singing quite a bit on my sopa stream (Excellent resolution)...Thanks to those who link'd it last night!
Still impressed by that McEvoy kid, I think he had the most successful dribbles on the night apart from Adama or Ebwelle
I also realized that I mistakenly referred to #2 as Bagnack, Bagnack was the CB who should've been booked on a rash challenge on McEvoy...Anyone know who the African RB with #2 was?...I was really impressed with him...Turns out his name is Godswill
Believe me, Samper is technically better, no doubt.I know I am not the coach but why the heck isn't Bagnack playing as DM? He is quite reminiscent of Busquets. Technically, he is the best in the team, IMO.
Believe me, Samper is technically better, no doubt.
& I really like Bagnack as a defender, let's keep him in that position.