Lol.. the point being what.
Dakt said that we played well with Villa and Pedro.
And that we didn't need MSN.
You replied that we didn't play well because of Villa and Pedro, but because of Xavi and Iniesta.
Your post sounded as if MSN are bad only because we don't have Xavi and Iniesta anymore.
And poor guys can't win matches alone.
My post says that we had midfields without Xavi and Iniesta in the past, and our strikers who were "way weaker" than MSN, managed to play way better than mighty MSN, who struggle without "a proper midfield".
My point is that MSN in reality are way weaker than MSN on paper/MSN on youtube/MSN on manager games/MSN on forums in terms of being the best attacking trio ever.
They should be able to do way more even with any semi-decent midfield, if they were as Godlike as people hyping them.