PSG has gas dollars, they can spend 1 billion if they really want, we payed 57 on Neyjunk instead for assuring our future defense with at least one CB and players that have already proven something at the European level where we need to compete, we're not in Brazil or Bolivia. 28 million+10 million was already a cosmic sum for a player like him, unacceptable for a club that isn't financed by oil and gas dollars.
But they didn't spend 1 billion, they spent 45m (on Lucas).
No offense but I think it's pretentious to assume Neymar will offer nothing in return for the money. It may be entirely possible he will be underwhelming, but just as possible that he'll light it up.
It's best to hold a neutral view towards the player even if you have criticism regarding aspects of his purchase, otherwise you will continue to find evidence to reinforce your belief that he was a waste during his entire term, even if he performs.
As awful as Torres was, it was that kind of pressure that wracked his brain and I have no doubt in my mind that he bought into it after a while.
There are plenty of players that have come from South America to europe and adapted imediately.
There seems to be some kind of myth that players dont.
People like train wrecks in football just as much as glory. Failures tend to be more prominent in people's memory.
One thing that seriously annoys me is when pundits/commentators analyze a player in game through the lense of his transfer fee, expecting him to justify it at any given moment, immediately, in whatever match they are commenting on. Though some players it's semi-true like Hulk.