Barcilliant
Senior Member
He doesn't play much. That's one of the problems. IMO he should play every Copa game and start a few league games too.
He doesn't play much. That's one of the problems. IMO he should play every Copa game and start a few league games too.
He is a decent finisher and I'm pretty sure he could score 20 goals for a La Liga team which is good enough to qualify for an international spot.
However, he is the back-up of one of our most reliable players so he doesn't get the necessary time on the pitch. 30 Mio. for a real back-up sounds like a waste of money but you need a good bench too.
Mio. for a real back-up sounds like a waste of money but you need a good bench too.
This forum is not logical at times at all. One one hand we complain that Madrid has so much better depth than us, and on the other hand we say spending 30m. on a rotational player is a waste of money. Just doesn't make any sense.
Do you know how money Madrid spent for their rotational players? The figure is guaranteed to makes you dizzy. That is the difference.
What else did I say? lol
You said 30m. for a backup player sounds like a waste of money. No, it doesn't. It's a perfectly normal sum for today's football.
Since we have signed him for a lot of money and he has started to come good, we can keep him. But we need to prepare a Suarez replacement for the future
Kane?
Mbappe?
Any other player? We shall see
I think we stand no chance with Mbappe, City has apparently bid 130m Euros (which Monaco have allegedly declined) and Madrid have allegedly matched the offer. Plus he's a Madrid/Penaldo/Zidane fanboy, so for sure we can forget about him.
For Suarez's proper replacement, we have a season or two before we get there, so I'm pretty sure there will be some names on the block at that time who we can target.