Paulinho

Idk about you guys, but Im sick and tired of seeing our team play with 10 whenver we play against a team that divides the ball.

If Busquets continues to be useless in thoae games, i would not think twice about playing him over Busquets.
 

Nothanks

New member
Also forgot, this guy would also be very useful against the chelseas or other park the buss type of teams.
its nice to have a good physical player for corners / crosses
 

FCBfan22

Senior Member
Idk about you guys, but Im sick and tired of seeing our team play with 10 whenver we play against a team that divides the ball.

If Busquets continues to be useless in thoae games, i would not think twice about playing him over Busquets.


With a box to box midfielder instead of a proper CDM with Pique in his current form behind him would be a suicide.
 

DonAndres

Wild Man of Borneo
Also forgot, this guy would also be very useful against the chelseas or other park the buss type of teams.
its nice to have a good physical player for corners / crosses

Not just for crosses/corners, but literally to dismantle the bus.

If we're playing against a parked bus in a game where we have insane possession but minimal chances created and no lanes to break through, most of the time it's because the tempo of the game is too slow. In that case, I would sub in Paulinho for Rakitic for example. You sacrifice some control and possession that you had in over-abundance, and input Paulinho's quick 1-touch style and off the ball attacking play. Suddenly, the tempo of the game becomes faster and our play becomes more vertical. The problem with parked buses has ALWAYS been speed of play and tempo.

If EV can use this type of substitution deliberately and effectively, then Paulinho will be the true parked-bus killing solution that we've dreamed of for years.
 
With a box to box midfielder instead of a proper CDM with Pique in his current form behind him would be a suicide.

And hasnt it been suicide already? Might as well play someone who will be a threat going forward.


Although maybe having Semedo will make it harder for teams to get us in the counter, in which case, we might be able to get away with playing busquets in those games. But the same argument could be made about playing Paulinho
 

FCBfan22

Senior Member
Busi is doing the dirty work as any CDM should. He has been consistent and provided what we need from him. If he wasn't playing we would concede far more goals. Paulinho is doing great as a CM, so why would we experiment with him as CDM in big games?
 

xXKonan

Senior Member
While he's not the Controller/creative CM we need, he's different from all the options we have in the Midfield currently and this is coming from a guy who was against signing him from the start. He definately will provide something different from a tactical point of view like we seen today and vs Getafe.
 

serghei

Senior Member
Very impressed by his offensive quality. He's doing everything Suarez should be doing with the good linkups with Messi, physical holdup play vs CB's, and clinical finishing.

It should be observed that Paulinho is, for the most part, an off the ball player. He had only 8 passes in the 1st half playing as a midfielder, and though the numbers rose in the 2nd half a vast majority of those passes were 1 touch back to the man or to an adjacent man. He spends very little time on the ball ever, and mostly plays supporting roles and attacks as an outlet player. As long as he stays effective at what he's doing, that's a valuable option to have to change the pace of the game and introduce verticality as BrazilBrazilBrazil says. Those weapons are great for a midfield sub to change tempo, and IMO also as an option for striker. He's doing what Suarez should be doing and those actions were in the areas of the pitch that Suarez would generally operate in. I genuinely think he can and should play there to rest Suarez or bench him if he stays off form, moreso than Paco.

The downside is that Paulinho is limited in the role that he can take. For starting midfielders in big games, they need to be primary ball handlers who spread the play and dictate the game. If our main option CM's were as bypassed as Paulinho was in that first half, we would get absolutely MURDERED by the likes of RM's midfield. But later in a game to change tempo and adapt to the end-to-end evolution of a football match, subbing Paulinho would probably be a significant change. So much so that he's made to be an awesome sub (if he plays his role well) because he's an X factor and allows us to change our play at will rather than sub someone in who's the same as our other midfielders only worse.

All in all, I'm very happy with what he's turning out to be. He's exactly the kind of useful squad player you should have. Versatile, hardworking, and brings a different approach to the table that truly changes your game and keeps opponents guessing.

True. He's an off the ball player mostly. Easy there with him playing CF though. This was only Eibar at home. Suarez would've scored 2 goals tonight for sure even with his bad form.
 
Last edited:
How the hell did he end up in China? Seems like the kind of guy who'd have a lot more ambition than that. Should have tried to salvage his european career, even if it meant a pay cut.
 

xXKonan

Senior Member
I wonder how he would work in a 4-4-2 diamond him being at the tip of the Midfield acting like a second striker in some games.
 

JamDav1982

Senior Member
How the hell did he end up in China? Seems like the kind of guy who'd have a lot more ambition than that. Should have tried to salvage his european career, even if it meant a pay cut.

Said he had bad experience at Spurs and just wanted to go somewhere trusted to try and revive career.

As far as I remember Spurs didnt play him the way Brazil do and Barca have they tried to involve him more in midfield and didnt suit him.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top