Barcilliant
Senior Member
Yup agree. He adds something to the team that we’ve been missing.
He brings unpredictability. Too often in the past we've lost because we are too predictable.
Yup agree. He adds something to the team that we’ve been missing.
Didn't someone say song was better for barca than this guy?
But what will DonAndres say about his performance today?
Lack of nuance such as this just makes the discussion here much worse I must say.
Feels like nobody bothered to actually read what I posted in the chat or in the threads. I was pretty clear and specific in what my issue was and I don't think it's been contradicted. I have ONLY ever expressed a problem with having Paulinho start in place of a CM such as taking Rakitic/Iniesta's places in the lineup. I've said he does not have the skillset for that role at all and doesn't play like it on the pitch. I don't think this should be surprising to anyone tbh.
EV himself acted in a way that's in line with that thinking. He didn't start Paulinho over Rakitic or Iniesta for the Clasico. If it's a matter of Paulinho vs Deulofeu/Vidal/Denis then the situation is different entirely. That's sacrificing a winger for Paulinho's off ball support defensively and attacking in/around the box. With the current landscape of this squad and considering Deulo really isn't an effective player (especially against a team like RM) sacrificing the width of a mediocre winger is a very worthy risk to take and it paid off. Seeing how establishing control of the midfield and elevating our circulation of the ball is what eventually swung the Clasico in our favor during the 2nd half, no one now should have doubts about how crucial it is for us to emphasize control and not sacrifice it for extra hustle or attacking.
As problematic as Rakitic can be he is still far and away better at taking midfield responsibilities to circulate the ball and establish control over the game than Paulinho and EV seems to agree here. Under no circumstances should Paulinho take his starting place in big games the way things are but he can definitely play alongside them both. Paulinho continuously shows that he's not fit for that role and even in his commendable Clasico performance he had *9 turnovers*, more than the rest of the team COMBINED. That isn't a big problem seeing as he didn't have the ball circulation responsibilities of the other midfielders but there shouldn't be any confusion as to what he is and what he isn't, and that does limit the kind of role he can safely have on this team.
I actually happen to think that, if we buy Arthur and/or Coutinho, I'd rather keep Paulinho in the squad and sell Rakitic. Coming off the bench Paulinho has a much better ability to change the dynamic of the game and the verticality of the attack and that he's wayyy more useful in that role than Raki. He's easily the best rotation player in our midfield for that reason that he actually does bring useful game-changing qualities.
Hamzah you mentioned Song but seemed to forget that I was again making that point to talk about on-ball qualities in the midfield. I even mentioned at the time that Paulinho is definitely the better overall player but highlighted how much he is lacking in that one area of the game. Paulinho can add way more playing in a 4 man midfield as a hybrid secondary striker but there definitely are roles that Song would execute better just because of his greater competence in one area, playing as Busi's substitute for example.
He is the only midfielder that plays in midfield ( Bob...) who has an eye for scoring and not just trying to find Messi.
Usually never get jersey's with a players name on it, might make an exception for Paulinho. Expect it to become a collector's item.