Centauri B
New member
Is somebody trying to tell us something with all these injuries?
If his exact goals this season had been scored by Ronaldo, everybody on here would be talking about tap-ins and insignificance. Take away Paulinho's goals and assists and we would have two points less in the league. That number is the same for Denis, for example.
Difference is we are not rating him as the best ever for the tap ins. Scoring Tapins are fine ,but to rate such a one dimensional player as world's best is delusion .If his exact goals this season had been scored by Ronaldo, everybody on here would be talking about tap-ins and insignificance. Take away Paulinho's goals and assists and we would have two points less in the league. That number is the same for Denis, for example.
No? Why would he be rated the best ever for 8 goals in any case? The principle by which both players are being overrated by their goals is the same. I don't see how the difference in scale negates my point.
Your point is wrong if trying to claim his goals/assists have only contributed to two points.
Paulinho isnt being over rated he has been good for Barca.
I was replying to the other guy. And yes, but that's not what I said - i just took the raw number to illustrate a point. And yes, he's been good in some games. He's also been absolutely useless in others. Because quite like Ronaldo, if he doesn't get the right pass, time his run and find his moment, then he might as well not be playing.
I was replying to the other guy. And yes, but that's not what I said - i just took the raw number to illustrate a point. And yes, he's been good in some games. He's also been absolutely useless in others. Because quite like Ronaldo, if he doesn't get the right pass, time his run and find his moment, then he might as well not be playing.
I get that he plays a factor there, but that role being so vague, it's very open to interpretation as to what it actually requires. My evaluation is that the role could be filled just as well by a player who also had the dexterity to engage somewhat constructively in the link-up play with Messi.But that's secondary in his role. His primary role is being Messi's fascilitator.
I get that he plays a factor there, but that role being so vague, it's very open to interpretation as to what it actually requires. My evaluation is that the role could be filled just as well by a player who also had the dexterity to engage somewhat constructively in the link-up play with Messi.
Don't know how many times Paulinho has "facilitated" a situation in which Messi could do something only to subsequently fuck the whole thing up because he recevied the ball in a tight space.