CatalinR10
Senior Member
Came on, did nothing. Business as usual for Paulinho, can't live without him.
didn't fuck up anything aswell , also busquets gets some rest.
Came on, did nothing. Business as usual for Paulinho, can't live without him.
Came on, did nothing. Business as usual for Paulinho, can't live without him.
0.
Still fucked up less than Gomes with his obligatory misplaced pass and a foul.
I genuinely have a hard time deciding who is worse. Paulinho and his vanishing act so convincing he might be part of the X-Men, or Gomes and his ability to make everything he touches turn to shit.
Gomes. 100%. At least Paulinho doesn't fuck everything up.
I would start Paulinho above Iniesta.
When ever Paulinho starts to move forward there just seems to be unpredictability in the attack.
Just feels right. lol
See, I'm just not sure. Would I rather have an 11th player who's bad, or play with 10 men?
Gotta weigh the pros and cons.
When ever Paulinho starts to move forward there just seems to be unpredictability in the attack.
It is baffling how you manage to find time to bash a player after a 4-1 win, especially considering that he didn't cause the goal we conceded plus he actually did take part in the fourth goal by playing a one-two with Semedo. Did you expect him to come on the pitch and complete a hat-trick? We did not need a goal, Paulinho did not go forward as much. Simple as that. He was brought to replace Busi for precaution. Save your criticism for times when it will be actually warranted.
You're fired.
I'm commenting on multiple threads, finding time is easy, I'm not doing anything else.
Paulinho is a player who has minimal impact on games. Gomes came on and saw the ball more than Paulinho, even if he was poor with it. Denis came on and instantly made a larger impact as well. Paulinho, on the other hand, spent the majority of his time standing either next to a defender, or in between two of them. It's not as if this is something new to when we're leading and trying to close out a game, either.