Pedro Rodriguez
- Thread starter M.L. King
- Start date
FlyLo
New member
V
Valon
Guest
Why not? It's an amazing feat.
E
Esteve
Guest
Christ....
E
Esteve
Guest
Yeah, very happy for him. Hasn't let us down this season.
FlyLo
New member
His goals? Yea, you can't mention it enough. Pedro is truly amazing.
The comparison however, was irrelevant. Different positions, different qualities. And, perhaps more importantly (without bringing down Pedro's accomplishments): would Pedro have scored all those goals if Zlatan hadn't been on the pitch when he scored most of them? I just see no reason why he had to compare Pedros goals to Zlatans. Can't they be amazing on their own?
And, on a different note: why didn't Pedro get the trophy for (at least) third best player last night?
Last edited:
predator_89
Allah Akbar
What an awesome player
i expect him a good future in barca
:flagvl8:
i expect him a good future in barca
:flagvl8:
Metaphysical
Bomb Dropper
because bojan is a youknowwhat.
great post.
because these "best player" awards are usually shite.
I mean, denilson was probably player of the tournament it's just the rest of his team was shit. but if you take the provisio that the winner has to come from the winners then for overall consistency of performance then busquets was probably our best player. but if you accept that it has to be an attacking player then it's zlatan. if you wanna give it for impact then yeah, messi deserves it (game-turner in the semi's, winner in the finals - vs. pedro's meaningless one in semi's and game-turner in the final. the maths = messi) but pedro should surely be third ahead of xavi.
but yeah, they probably just make that shit up.
Yeh i agree Denilson was Player of the Tournament. Top goal scorer, tried to get his team back in to the match when they were down to 9 & losing in the Semis. He even played their goalie when they were down to 8.
It's a real shame that brilliance and dedication isn't recognised when it comes from a non-glamorous name playing for a third-placed team. I was atleast hoping he would be second or third. But, FIFA is inept. So, u can expect these things.
It's a real shame that brilliance and dedication isn't recognised when it comes from a non-glamorous name playing for a third-placed team. I was atleast hoping he would be second or third. But, FIFA is inept. So, u can expect these things.
Last edited:
F
FCB_Titi_LB
Guest
Zanela..that may well be but would you compare the top scorer in 3th devision with a mediocre scorer in 1st division? says it all
They all competed in a Cup tournament and should be fairly judged on how they perform in it rather than their past reputation or the standard of the league they play in.
F
FCB_Titi_LB
Guest
-> hello ,hello .... im not talking about the standard of their leagues. I'm talking about the difference in team quality and opposition in the tournament. Its easier to perform in lower rounds than higher ones.
Will a player which doesnt make the semis or final in CL be given best player of the tournament? The higher u go the more difficult to perform the more valuable the performance.
+ dont forget that the opposition at lower rounds is much weaker.
Barca only came in the tournament at the semis. says it all
But, he DID make the semis and even scored against Estudiantes even when his team was down to 9 men. He was the tournament's top goal scorer, which standard of oppositions he played prior is irrelevant. He should 've made the Top 3 easily. I'm sure had Messi been the top scorer and lost in the Semis, he would 've still made the Top 3. These awards are usually given to big names irrespective of their performances. I mean, Pedro & Bus were better than Xavi but the latter still came third.
Last edited:
Home of Barca Fans
