Obviously, any statistics need to be looked at in context. For example, the fact that a conventional Getafe striker makes more tackles and interceptions, performs more pressing actions and covers more distance than Raphinha does not mean that this Getafe player is better than Raphinha without the ball.
Why? Because the team of Raphinha (Barcelona) and Getafe play different football. I think you know what I mean.
But we can try to compare Salah and Raphinha as they play in teams that like to dominate, possess the ball, press, etc.
So, if we compare the performance of Salah and Raphinha in terms of the number of attempted tackles, interceptions, as well as the number of successful attempts to tackle and interceptions, then Raphinha’s performance is 2 times better.
If we look at the statistics on the distance covered (unfortunately, I only have access to indicators in the Champions League), then Raphinha covers an average of 13 meters more distances per minute. Yes, statistics on the intensity with which you cover the distance are much more informative. Yes, besides, we do not have public data on how many kilometers of this distance were covered when playing on defense. But such figures are not publicly available.
However, based on what we have on hand - statistics on the number of attempted tackles, interceptions and the percentage of success in the number of tackles, interceptions, statistics on distance covered + our observation of matches - we can conclude that without the ball in defense, Raphinha is much more effective than Salah.