No excuses, you cant spend all that precious oil money and hide it being a project.
This is the fifth year, psg should be up there and be able to convincingly beat anyone now.
Look at what Dortmund or Atletico accomplished while City and Psg continue to strugge in the cl, mostly because of us though
4 years only. And please don't compare City with Paris, the projects are not built in the same way. Look Paris with QSI and City with their emirati prince, they are no comparaison possible : Three 1/4 in row for Paris, 0 for City. And look the club we faced : Barca x2, Chelsea. Not easy draw.
And you missed something : the FFP. This fuckin joke of Financial Fair Play, created especially for Paris and City, by this scumbag of Platini ... Where was the Financial Fair Play between the 60's to 2000's for Barca, Real, Juve, Milan ?... I take an example : AC Milan. When Berlusconi took the club, it was on a bad situation, he invested massively. Paris and City can't do this because of the pressure of old clubs. It's like a night club : old members of the VIP clan won't everyone access to the VIP club. So it takes more time now, than 10 years ago. Other example (modern) : It was easier for Chelsea in 2004. And in this example, they needed 8 years to win the Champions League.
Paris could be Dortmund or Juve. We have everything for this : the most concentred area of talents in the world (with Rio), a beautiful city, 10 millions of in zero competitors in first division. They have but old shareholders (Canal + between 1991 et 2008 and an american group "Colony Capital" 2008-2012) were not interested by the result of the club. The club was just a toy for them. Now to win time, you need money. A lot of money.
This is the 4th year. But yes, winning the UCL within a 4 year frame is a completely reasonable expectation for a new sporting project.
Anyways.
Disagree. 4 years seriously ? Yes if you're a club like Barca, Bayern, Real maybe. But for a club from nowhere...