Koeman's football was pretty bad at the start with Messi putting up stinkers, and Koeman rolling out Griezmann, Coutinho, and Messi together upfront. But it only went up from there. A lot more entertaining even though the results started to falter near the end.
Way way better than what Valverde put the fans through.
EV won 2 out of 2 La ligas.
And totally dominated El classicos.
He was almost undefeated in the first season.
Then we have Koeman who barely ended the 3rd and who lost every single big match this season.
But hey, he plays more entertaining...
If someone will reply that EV had a better team:
February 2016 to May 2017, Lucho was 15-20 points behind RM in those 18 Months accumulated.
He lost 2:0 to AM, 4:0 to Psg and 3:0 to Juve.
EV comes, loses Neymar, loses forever injured Dembele and plays without Cou and turns that Lucho's loser team into almost invincibles.
Though, he lost to Roma and 50 good previous matches are forgotten.
In the next season, EV is again winning La Liga, making fun out of RM in El Classicos.
In the third season, EV starts a season without injured Messi, Suarez, Dembele and loaned Coutinho.
He still managed to stay equal on points as RM.
Then Setien came, ending behind RM.
And then Koeman came, finishing 3rd.
So, what a coincidence:
1) in the last 18 months before EV, we were 15-20 points behind RM
2) during EV, we were like 20-30 points infront of RM
3) after EV, we are against consistently behind RM, who even lost CR7 and has Vinicius and Hazard in attack
But yes, it's all a coincidence...
I know, EV played ugly and had two bad CL defeats.
But La Liga wise, he was a master.