The question is what happened in the past week or so for the sudden change of narrative. Undisputed starter to getting subbed at the 60 twice and now on the bench.
Now the media are talking of replacements in January. All very weird.
In any case, replacing in January is the wrong idea because we just won't get the quality unless it is an advance of a 2023 expiree that meets the requirements. Tielemens is the best of a bad bunch but is he even a defensive midfielder? Plus I reckon Arsenal will be all over him as they have been in the past and they are having a season that finally validates their project.
You specifically will hate this idea, but best we go with Frenkie for the rest of the season and adapt the two central midfielders around that as we had with Busquets.
Then in the summer get a proper replacement whoever that may be.
What happened IMO is that Busi's performances were abysmal in the crucial games.
Even by his standards: bas misplaced passes, giving rise to counters, losing possession easily
Tielemans is not a DM. and his defending and pressing ability are guestionable
FDL is abysmall as pivot.
we play the best of Busi/FDJ at pivot depending on the game until January.
Then, we should buy a starter there, even if we buy again in the summer.
Having a functional player there is the difference between titles Vs no titles this season
Yep, for some reason when it comes to Busquets whoever replaces him has to be the exact same type of player, there is no consideration we could go for a different style of DM or change formations, as if all the other top teams haven't done without a Busquets for the last decade..
Old argument.
It's not happening under Xavi. He wants his pivot.
Could have happened with Koeman, if he changed to a 4-2-3-1 which plays to FDJ's strenghts.
He tried it, and he abandoned it.
We will not see that any time soon