Can't believe what I am reading in this thread... holy shit.
Same, don't worry it's justified because Rakitic the sideways and backwards passing, press resistant merchant is having a better season than Busquets
Can't believe what I am reading in this thread... holy shit.
Same, don't worry it's justified because Rakitic the sideways and backwards passing, press resistant merchant is having a better season than Busquets
Lol. The 2 best players on the team are the burdens... Wow.I am on "Busi is not that good anymore" train lately.
Messi is a burden to our team in terms that he wants a free role in every formation.
Then we have Busi who can play only in 433.
And then, 433 won't work because Messi wants a free role, for example.
So, we suck in a CL for years, we are already one dimensional and cases like Messi and Busi aren't helping either.
I would never sell Messi, but about Busi, imo, he is a type of a player who can play well only in 433 and when a team plays awesome and when he is surrounded by awesome midfielders.
I wouldn't give him a higher salary.
I would personally sell him for any price higher than 70-80M Euros, considering that he will be slower and slower and how we can't play anything but 433 with him.
Thanks for everything, but no one is greater than a club, especially a heavily declining player.
The last two pages.
Busi is our 2nd best player and as important as Messi. If somebody thinks he did not have a good season, they should quit watching football. Everybody is taking him for granted while he is being one of the best players in history. His usual play is above everyone else's.
Lol. The 2 best players on the team are the burdens... Wow.
And no Messi doesn’t want a free role. He wants a central role...
So what if Busquets is at his best when playing in a single pivot? He is not the first player to prefer it and he certainly won’t be the last. There are many systems you can play with a single pivot. 4-3-3/4-1-4-1/4-1-3-2/3-3-1-3...
How about Rakitic who is now useless in a 4-3-3 and must play in a double pivot? Suárez who can only play centrally? Why is it that Messi has had to move further away from goal so that Rakitic and Suárez can be comfortable? Why is that Paulinho/Gomes/Iniesta have had to play wide as a consequence?
When looking at the squad as a whole it is Rakitic and Suárez whom are the outliers and yet the system was adapted to accommodate them.
Aleñá will be promoted, Arthur is coming, Griezmann is coming, Oriol, depending on his recovery, might make the jump too... When this happens it leaves Rakitic and Suárez in an even more precarious situation because the squad is even more geared to 4-3-3.
We are onedimensional due to still living under Pep's shadow with 433 with short players who are sterile in a CL when an opponent parks the bus around the box and when the edge of the box is crowded with defenders.
If you want to move to something new and more dimensional, you can't: because of a 433, Messi and Busquets, for example.
How can you buy a taller Cf who needs to play centrally if Messi also want to play centrally?
How can you move from 433 when Busi plays good only there (I know that you mentioned some other formations).
Look, if you are one of fans who think that 433 is still awesome and how short, technical players are the way to go, I can see why would you think that nothing is wrong with 433, Messi, Busi, burdens from Pep's era etc.
if you want to evolve and try to take a CL or two from RM in the next 10 years, then 433, short players, Messi, Busi, being one dimensional are huge burdens to our team.
I am not saying that we should get rid of all of burdens, but how it seems in this moment, in the next season:
1. we'll again play 433
2. we'll again play with short-technical players
3. we will still be one dimensional
4. Messi and Busi will still be burdens
5. RM will win a CL again, because of points 1 to 4, quite simple
In short, if you still believe that we should copy Pep's ideas, then saying bad about Busi is crazy.
If you want to evolve, then Busi is a questionable guy in our future plans.
Messi and Busquets are only 2 players in a team of 11. Your obsession with tall, strong players is bordering on insane right now.We are onedimensional due to still living under Pep's shadow with 433 with short players who are sterile in a CL when an opponent parks the bus around the box and when the edge of the box is crowded with defenders.
If you want to move to something new and more dimensional, you can't: because of a 433, Messi and Busquets, for example.
How can you buy a taller Cf who needs to play centrally if Messi also want to play centrally?
How can you move from 433 when Busi plays good only there (I know that you mentioned some other formations).
Look, if you are one of fans who think that 433 is still awesome and how short, technical players are the way to go, I can see why would you think that nothing is wrong with 433, Messi, Busi, burdens from Pep's era etc.
if you want to evolve and try to take a CL or two from RM in the next 10 years, then 433, short players, Messi, Busi, being one dimensional are huge burdens to our team.
I am not saying that we should get rid of all of burdens, but how it seems in this moment, in the next season:
1. we'll again play 433
2. we'll again play with short-technical players
3. we will still be one dimensional
4. Messi and Busi will still be burdens
5. RM will win a CL again, because of points 1 to 4, quite simple
In short, if you still believe that we should copy Pep's ideas, then saying bad about Busi is crazy.
If you want to evolve, then Busi is a questionable guy in our future plans.
BBZ, what are you talking about? We played tiki taka only with Pep. We've played way more rigid setups after him.
The recent failures in CL have been with rigid setups.
[MENTION=16942]BBZ8800[/MENTION] considers our 2 best performers burdens and would much rather have us sign big, strong workhorses.
we used 442 this year against Roma with only three players under 5'10 and produced our worst CL performance in recent history
BBZ, what are you talking about? We played tiki taka only with Pep. We've played way more rigid setups after him.
The recent failures in CL have been with rigid setups.
We are onedimensional due to still living under Pep's shadow with 433 with short players who are sterile in a CL when an opponent parks the bus around the box and when the edge of the box is crowded with defenders.
If you want to move to something new and more dimensional, you can't: because of a 433, Messi and Busquets, for example.
How can you buy a taller Cf who needs to play centrally if Messi also want to play centrally?
How can you move from 433 when Busi plays good only there (I know that you mentioned some other formations).
Look, if you are one of fans who think that 433 is still awesome and how short, technical players are the way to go, I can see why would you think that nothing is wrong with 433, Messi, Busi, burdens from Pep's era etc.
if you want to evolve and try to take a CL or two from RM in the next 10 years, then 433, short players, Messi, Busi, being one dimensional are huge burdens to our team.
I am not saying that we should get rid of all of burdens, but how it seems in this moment, in the next season:
1. we'll again play 433
2. we'll again play with short-technical players
3. we will still be one dimensional
4. Messi and Busi will still be burdens
5. RM will win a CL again, because of points 1 to 4, quite simple
In short, if you still believe that we should copy Pep's ideas, then saying bad about Busi is crazy.
If you want to evolve, then Busi is a questionable guy in our future plans.