Beast
The Observer
What? Both Carnevale and Di Napoli were integral part of the team that won the first Napoli title.
Lol. Why don't you also imagine that Elche gets FINANCIAL POWER to break WORLD RECORD TRANSFER FEE to bring Messi in, like Napoli did in Maradona case.
Napoli finished 8th in Maradona's first season.
Yes and i said taken Serie A by storm before they arrived .. the 2 years before Maradona arrived Napoli was 1 point & 2 points away from Relegation.. Suddenly Maradona made them a pain in everyone butt .. scoring enough goals to come third in the goal scoring charts and beating the likes of Inter & holding the powerful house Juve.. we are talking about 1 player alone with a 19 year old promising defender... no more no less .. look at Juve & co lineup
Yes they Mafia supplied the money but unlike now it was just one player... it also took a lot of balls for Maradona as Napoli was a true nobody.. no one dared to do such a thing
- Yes you are right I meant the next season after the 8th they went up to third...
ElKajer actually came third in the European player of the year several times during that era and he is by far the best Danish striker of all time (Laudrup isn't a striker ) .. and unlike the case with Napoli they had more stars like Briegle etcI wasn't actually asking for any name. Yes, I knew about Elkjær and knew he's on that team. I was also old enough to watch him in 1986, although I was very young back then and it was my first tournament I watched "live" on TV.
My point was despite being a very good player, Elkjær was no "greatest of all time." And what he achieved with Verona should put Maradona's achievement with Napoli into perspective. While Maradona helped turn a relegation-battling team into league champion in a few season, some other guy had already done a similar feat by helping take a recently-promoted team to the league title. Although Maradona was definitely one of the greatest footballers in history, what he did with Napoli speaks more about how evenly powered the teams in Serie A were than his quality as a footballer.
You wouldn't expect Elkjær to lead today's Elche to trophy if he was born 30 years late, would you?
That's my point, every team had a star so there wasn't one truly dominant team within the league, unlike today's RM/Barca in Spain, PSG in France, Bayern in Germany... I could go on. So it was a lot easier back then to turn a mid-table club into a title challenger by adding 1 superstars and a few more quality players.
Every top league nowadays is dominated by 1 or 2 teams, with a squad full of international superstars, and no one single player, no matter how great, can turn a relegation-battling team into title challenger.
and Verona was not coming from relegation if i remember correctly Verona was in Serie A for a very long time when they won Serie A and before they won the league the two seasons before they came 4th & 6th not escaping relegation like Napoli did..so it's not the same as Napoli situation who were on the decline
Serie A have much more stars in all teams unlike now where leagues are dominated by you & us makes it all the more harder don't you think ? harder games & tougher leagues ..so how it's easy ?? you go into the league now & you expect Barca & Real to win all games except the Clasico and maybe 1 or 2 games away ...back than it's impossible to predict any outcome because 7-8 teams are competing.. and if it's just any superstar Zico would have won it with Udinese ... and he was no small star.. apart from Maradona's Napoli they rest had strong teams
No ElKjaer wouldn't lead Elche because he already had a very solid Verona team with him.. Maradona didn't as i said Ciro Ferrara who went on to be one of Juve greatest defenders was a kid.. a 19 year old .. the rest of them followed and until now you cannot put Carnavale , Di Napoli or even Careca as the best in any form of historical posts.. .. you'd put Maradona.. you might put Ferrara .. that team won 2 impossible leagues titles they first & last league title for Napoli not a one off & a good UEFA cup on top...
I don't understand how you say a league dominated by 2 teams is better than a league dominated by 6-7 teams.. or winning that one is harder