So a year younger than Rakitic and few ofhers ..he's also strong and mobile - I've always rated him .
Both born 1988.
N'Zonzi is a good player, however I don't think we should spend 40 mill on this type of player who is 30 yo too boot. We have Rakitic and Busquets who are similar players position wise and then there's Arthur who can do some of the things N'Zonzi does(passing, covering ground). Admittedly he's tall, can tackle really well and is a good passer of the ball but personally I wouldn't buy him.
That's not how AGES work 2018 less1988
Rakitic is 31in a few weeks .... Nzonzi is 30 in December..
So he's actually 1 year 3 months younger than Rakky
He is not good enough, we need someone better. He can only be a backup, we need someone who can actually improve our midfield and not someone who can cover for Busi or Rakitic when they are suspended or injured. Pass!
That's not how AGES work 2018 less1988
Rakitic is 31in a few weeks .... Nzonzi is 30 in December..
So he's actually 1 year 3 months younger than Rakky
Plus he's much faster , more mobile and more aggressive than Rakitic
He played very well against Modric and Rakitic in the World Cup final !!
What are you smoking, bro?
Rakitic is born in March 1988 and N'Zonzi December 1988. So rudimentary mathematics would tell you that Rakitic is 9 months older than N'Zonzi.
This lesson in mathematics is free of charge.
LOL what an argument! He was a SUBSTITUTE and he played for 35 min. Get a grip dude! He is an average player and he fore sure isn’t fast!
I simply consulted Google ... given I mentioned the months involved it's clear to all that my maths are fine and your logic is dodgy