ajnotkeith
Senior Member
Napoli didn't actually pay 80 for Osimhen, half of it was plusvalenza.
This is what happens when someone talks out there ass, but didn't take the time to do the simple math, lol.
They gotta start pulling all sorta crap out the air, to make their non sense line of argument make sense.
Napoli ain't selling for anything for less than Top top dollar & Oshimen, ain't making less than 10m at Barca.
So to make your "club could sign young striker, with longer contract" he's talking about give out 8-9 year contracts ����.
I could also afford a 4m house, I'll just tell the bank to give me a 70 year mortgage.
Oshimen doubling his 5m salary is 10m dumb ass, 3m less than lewa, still wouldn't make the difference for us to give him a realistic contract.
Club isn't giving him a 7-9 year contract, which is the only way the maths work.
Try harder, freaking cool.
Irrelevant what kinda accounting tricks Napoli used to sign him, they wanted over 100m to sell him, that's the only point that matters.
You dont have a clue about anything from his salary to his fee.
As usual.
Just keep making out other folk dont have a clue to suit how much garbage you claim.
Usual.
Oshimen would have move for less than Lewa on without a doubt last summer.
The words of Napoli were 100m would be a lot to turn down. I would be he would have gone for less last summer but we can take Napolis words as what it would have taken.
Oshimen for 100m as Napoli said and 'double' his wages would be less a cost on books than Lewa.
With a 7-9 year contract contract, which has no chance of happening.
Stupido, next time do the maths before talking.
Now it's less that 100m, & Oshimen has to take a 6m salary to make your crap argument work, lol.
They said 100m would be hard to turn down and teams needed to come to table with that.
I bet he would go for less last summer.
Cost on books be less than Lewa.
Exactly less, he's gotta spin to make it work, I knew you would say that ��.
Next time do the maths ma guy, then you won't have to keep moving the goal post to make your crap argument work.
But that's pretty much how it always works with, tuck.
Bye, threw your crap argument out the window & had you spinning already.