Well as a selection of players we have far greater variety of attributes, which you noted. As a unit I think Italia can call up on tremendous players in a tackling/physical position like Rino as well as have a very good metronome player like Pirlo. Spain for sure has the more in form players in this area, but Cesc, Xavi and Iniesta are all so similar, all small, all experts in the passing of the ball. For the physical, winning the ball back and damaging the opponent i'm not sure what Spain can look to is nearly so good, so it doesn't have as good a balance for me. As good as they are, i'm not so sure they will be as an effective midfield as Italia can be with the right motivation.Pippo, you voted italy. Care to explain your reasoning?
I do agree that their midfield has a great balance, Gattuso and Pirlo were once the greatest midfield pairing in football. Now, I don't know. It will be interesting who will take up these two roles when they are done. I think De Rossi is a candidate; however, is is more of a mix of the two. I admire Giovinco, I think he needs to find a new club since Juve obviously don't value him as much as he should be
I agree that Spain's midfielders are all in the same mold. I think that Marcos Senna was the biggest factor for Spain to win the Euros because of the balance which he brought to the team, now there isn't really a player who is willing to do the dirty stuff which Senna did (dirty as in physical)..
can't Alonso play that role?
You mean this dirty stuff?
This is a no brainer, Spain of course. Xavi, Iniesta, Silva, Cesc, Busquets, Alonso etc.
But England's midfield is also impressive.