I have quoted Cruyff on this multiple times - "playing simple football is the hardest thing"
My point has been in response to players like Arthur and others being criticized for playing too simple, not attempting enough hard passes etc. Then I said - Xavi played less speculative, more 'simple', with more patience, and he was the greatest of all time.
Just as now, I get a lot of disrespectful comments, but no explanation or examples. Yes vegitot manically posted a lot of irrelevant stats about absolute number of passes in opponents half and stuff like that, making my point for me. But here you have multiple people saying I'm a retarded clueless troll, without much attempt to argue. Well Gnidrologist makes some arguments, but not really on the points I've made.
Of course it is difficult to play 100 correct passes (correct not meaning reaching a target, but the right target) per game. My point always was that that was what made Xavi great, not his ability to spot the final ball.
Xavi didn't do a lot of "lasering through crowd of defenders" passes. As seen in that video, of the 20 assists, I think only 2 were in between defenders, most were on the outside or a cross. He was probably as good technically as almost anyone at making darting passes if he wanted to, but he was much more hesitant to make these passes compared to most midfielders, and that was part of what made him great. He waited until the right moment, and could get the assist with an easier pass in that way.
I ask you again, make a good argument why I'm wrong. Show a good representative video with difficult Xavi passes.