Search results

What was argued is that MATS did not threaten to leave, that he only made diplomatic comments when asked. Sport says he threatened and once Bravo leaves he's renewed. Suspicious.

Claudio Bravo leaves and MATS gets renewed until 2021. Totally unrelated coincidence :lol:

Thanks, but I like Barca forum. It's kind of fun being constantly attacked for my biased vision and being right all the time.

Anotherone with brilliant vision. Bang average.

Maybe. Or maybe I was able to read between the lines, understand MATS implied threats, and see the reason why Bravo was leaving. While you didn't. Which is fine, you were probably against his signing in the first place. Too old, too expensive, not good enough..

I actually said it on here before the story was published. Guess I was right.

Threatening?!?!?!?!?!

Damn, that Sport story sounds familiar. Who would have ever thought something like that to be true 🤔

Oh, look, you've stopped liking posts and started participating in the discussion! Good for you! That's what my source said was LE decision. Too bad the club ended up taking another choice after the blackmail.

Spanish super cup 2015 he played the first leg, fucked up big time, and we ended up losing it..

Of course he talked to the club wanting to know what would happen this season with the keeper position. That's when they told him he wouldn't be starting league or CL and was therefore forced to leave - at least those are the rumours I've read and I tend to beleive them. I think Claudio Bravo...

The keeper is at fault when his mistakes cost us goals. Like the one's wheve seen MATS make time and time again.

I agree with you on that Bravo has been much more diplomatic in the interviews conceded than MATS, who'se threatened to leave the club if he doesn't get more playing time. I don't agree with you on the mistakes being because MATS gets less playing time: we'll see this season how many brain farts...

Wow, you're really smart.

Bravo conceding goals at the same rate as Ter Stegen? Where did I read that the amount of goals a keeper is scored is a misleading stat?

Then what did the club talk to MATS and Bravo about? If Lucho decides who is playing and the club has nothing to do with it, I don't understand what MATS wanted to talk about

Tantrum, hissy fit.. whats the problem with debating different point of views? Well, Bravo has earned getting more playing time. Lets remember the disaster that occurred when MATS replaced him several matches in la Liga when he was injured

It's not Lucho's decision, it's the clubs. Lucho will obviously want to retain both keepers, he's the coach. The club would tell him who is the starting keeper in each competition. Unless you beleive the club doesnt meddle on whose starting..

My mistake. Thought Flavia and I were agreeing. No intent to flip anyones argument.

Great! We have reached another agreement. Bravo has performed better and the club is therefore selling the better performing keeper.