Search results

Soooooo lazy tonight. All his fault. :coffee:

I'd start him over Casillas next game.

I guess 2013-14 never happened then.

+1 The midfield left the defense exposed WAY too often. Still, him and Ramos were both shit.

FFP says hi.

I'd love it if RM lost Di Maria for 50m. Huge loss for them, and, in this market, a bargain for the buying club. Of course, it's never happening, because they'd have to be complete dumbasses to even think about letting him go.

+1

The fact that they keep being rushed back probably has something to do with it...

This pretty much sums it up. I don't blame Cesc himself, I blame the board for signing him in the first place. Because of his signing (which happened at a time in which we didn't need midfielders, as we had Xavi, Iniesta and Thiago): -We spent about 35m euros that could have been spent on a...

Doesn't have to be Soriano. I was just talking about getting a plan B bench striker instead of Aguero.

Yeah. If nothing else, we'll no longer be pushing players out of position to shoehorn Cesc into the lineup.

Don't compare Fabregas' departure to Pep's. Selling him wasn't a mistake, the mistakes were: a) buying him in the first place when we didn't need a midfielder, b) Not selling him last year instead of Thiago, and c) the price we got for him. I agree with you about everything else though.

:lol:

That part about why they sold Cesc was just classless by the club. I don't care if it's true, you don't do that. You just don't.

USA was second in the voting. Australia was last I believe.

That awkward moment when you realize that we got the same amount for Cesc as Everton did for Fellaini :zubi:

He's certainly not the signing I would have made, but as I said before, I'll judge after I see him play for us.

He was shit for Chelsea...

He'll probably rotate with Xavi. The big game midfield trio will still be Xavi-Busquets-Iniesta.

:smiley_scared: This is like Jaden saying that about Neymar... :lol: