Barca wasn't even the better team despite the early lead, with the goals having been scored on the break. What you are doing is revisionism! Ter Stegen made several very good blocks against shots from Müller and Lewa for instance. Barca played at full strength, Bayern's team was still severly hampered. Even if Barca "took the foot off the pedal at some point", it still isn't guaranteed that they could have stemmed themselves against the tidal wave and get back into the game after conceding the third (or with a lesser goalkeeper, the fourth or fifth), especially with Suarez off the pitch. You do remember how Porto broke within 20 minutes against Bayern?
Not saying that this whole would have been a likely scenario, just pointing out that without Ter Stegen's crucial saves in this match, this could have gone a different way altogether.
So goals being scoring on the break no longer count? In 2013, barca had 67% possession in the first leg and 63% possession in the 2nd leg. A PEAK BAYERN, playing against a rubbish Barca were more than happy to play defensive, basic brutish neanderthal football (before you kill me, I am only using your arguments...) In the 2nd leg BARCA had 17 shots against a mere 7 shots for Bayern. Defensive, isn't it?
Exactly, your argument (which I was borrowing in the above para) is just rubbish. Barcelona are better technically than Bayern. Barcelona are also more cerebral, philosophical than Bayern....don't say that Bayern may have advanced.
Let us get a few things straight:
1) Barcelona are just
better than Bayern and hence deserved to win. No more rubbish about ''Bayern may have advanced''
2) This is just my opinion, but Ter Stegen is not really better technically than Bravo
3) ter Stegen is more brutish than Bravo, which may help aerially though