JamDav1982
Senior Member
Do you praise someone if you argued with him?
Yeah would expect him too praise best player ever and who is claiming they argued anyway?
Do you praise someone if you argued with him?
Yeah would expect him too praise best player ever and who is claiming they argued anyway?
Messi and Pep were not the greatest buddies at Barca by end anyway. Not sure Messi has this great desire to go play with him as much is made out.
Who said anything about desperate long balls? I clearly said the better Premiership sides.Long balls are a proven losing tactic against smart football teams, almost without fail. Physicality and winning duels is great and all but you can't just create superiority through physical play. Positioning, high press, and forcing errors are a MUCH more reliable way to consistently win that 2nd ball and recover loose balls from errors. Teams that try desperate long balls and allow City to keep pinning them back in their half are playing right into Pep's hands and it's why he'll rack up plenty of blowout wins against the worse English sides. They also dominated Liverpool with this style of play and were dominating Chelsea despite the draw.
Yeah and I have never heard that they argued just that their was tension between the two in Peps last season. It was widely discussed at the time.
Even if they had a massive blazing row I would expect nothing but Pep to praise him and want him.
Yep, Chelsea we’re off colour though. Once Morata got injured they were devoid of ideas.Liverpool were the better team up until Mane red card even though City were 1-0 up they were looking more dangerous.
City beat Chelsea and were brilliant in that game to be fair.
Who said anything about desperate long balls? I clearly said the better Premiership sides.
nah, guardiola's playing philosophy is nearly perfect, the only minus being the sometimes suicidal high line. it gets stronger and stronger the more technical and virtuoso players you have. napoli being the starting level, pep's city and bayern being the proficient level, and barca 2011 being the extreme level. go watch the plays of the 2011 team against teams like jose's madrid and SAF's united. both coaches with a penchant for physical players and counter attacking football looked nearly clueless.
Joses Madrid battered Barca in a few of the games between the two as well though.
not a single time when pep was here. this is just wrong.
There was one game at Camp Nou Real could have been 3/4-0 up at half time I am sure that was Pep v Jose will need to look it up.
Real beat Barca a few times as well as that and were not clueless.
Who said anything about desperate long balls? I clearly said the better Premiership sides.
There was one game at Camp Nou Real could have been 3/4-0 up at half time I am sure that was Pep v Jose will need to look it up.
Real beat Barca a few times as well as that and were not clueless.
Pep v mou in 2010-11 and 2011-12
barca 5-0 madrid
barca 0-1 madrid
barca 2-0 madrid
barca 1-1 madrid
barca 1-1 madrid
barca 2-2 madrid
barca 3-2 madrid
barca 3-1 madrid
barca 2-1 madrid
barca 2-2 madrid
barca 1-2 madrid
5W, 2L, 4D. I would call that fairly one sided.
Inter did it yeah, Chelsea did it twice, Arsenal did it... All to various degrees of success but it was a tactic that worked particular if you sat very deep as Inter did.nah, guardiola's playing philosophy is nearly perfect, the only minus being the sometimes suicidal high line. it gets stronger and stronger the more technical and virtuoso players you have. napoli being the starting level, pep's city and bayern being the proficient level, and barca 2011 being the extreme level. go watch the plays of the 2011 team against teams like jose's madrid and SAF's united. both coaches with a penchant for physical players and counter attacking football looked nearly clueless.
also all 4 of pep's years at barca, the team wasn't on the same level. 09 and especially 11 were the peaks, 10 was brilliant but mired by that inter game, and 12 was the beginning of a slight decline.