El Flaco
Active member
10 goals and 21 assists as a 19 year old in Bundesliga are incredible stats.
[tw]878209726659547136[/tw]
Also this (although Dembele had yet to play 2 remaining BuLi matches + DfB-final).
[tw]860820744418275328[/tw]
10 goals and 21 assists as a 19 year old in Bundesliga are incredible stats.
But lets not pretend he didnt play for 2nd best team in bundes, im not saying he is bad, just unproven on biggest stage and he can at the end become flop, 150 for that is a joke
One season in Ligue 1 in a bottom half table team too, but you probably don't even know about that.
I guess everyone that you haven't personally watched is unproven then.I surely didnt watch him there, did you? Or just you tube compilations?
I noticed guy likes to hold on the ball and lose it often, finishing is also not his best strength, i would not complain if he came at reasonble price, but now he has to become matchwinner fast to start showing he might be worth it, and i doubt he will do that.
Those stats a great for any teenage player playing on any team. 20+ assists in a single season as a teenager is unheard of. Of course paying 150m was a bad deal on our part, but it would've been the case no matter which player we went after. Teams knew we had the 222m from the Neymar deal and were really desperate to get someone in; we were always going to have to massively overpay.
He's 20, he hasn't had many chances to prove himself on the big stage. He still had 2 goals and 6 assists in 10 matches in the CL last year, which is still very good.
Look, dont understand me wrong, i hope you are right and dembele helps barca reach higher level, but im not convinced and its a huge gamble
So tell us which non Youtube skillz player would have been a less of a gamble and the fee for which we could have bought him for to replace a key player like Neymar.
So tell us which non Youtube skillz player would have been a less of a gamble and the fee for which we could have bought him for to replace a key player like Neymar.
In the first place, why did even barca rushed to replace neymar with similar type of player? Didnt last two seasons teached us that having so unbalanced squad is not solution, mighty front three and average midfield, i would not replace neymar with same type of player and for sure i would not spend such money on attacker when in midfield rakitic is in first 11.
But now barca will buy probably coutinho for 100+ m, how far barca can keep like this we will see.
In the first place, why did even barca rushed to replace neymar with similar type of player? Didnt last two seasons teached us that having so unbalanced squad is not solution, mighty front three and average midfield, i would not replace neymar with same type of player and for sure i would not spend such money on attacker when in midfield rakitic is in first 11.
But now barca will buy probably coutinho for 100+ m, how far barca can keep like this we will see.
In the first place, why did even barca rushed to replace neymar with similar type of player? Didnt last two seasons teached us that having so unbalanced squad is not solution, mighty front three and average midfield, i would not replace neymar with same type of player and for sure i would not spend such money on attacker when in midfield rakitic is in first 11.
But now barca will buy probably coutinho for 100+ m, how far barca can keep like this we will see.
In the first place, why did even barca rushed to replace neymar with similar type of player? Didnt last two seasons teached us that having so unbalanced squad is not solution, mighty front three and average midfield, i would not replace neymar with same type of player and for sure i would not spend such money on attacker when in midfield rakitic is in first 11.
But now barca will buy probably coutinho for 100+ m, how far barca can keep like this we will see.
How did 'incompetence' lead to Coutinho not being signed?