M
MessiCam
Guest
When I say 442 I mean 4 TRUE midfielders, like: Iniesta/Coutinho/Rakitic/Busquets/Gomes/Paulinho.
What we played yesterday might have been 442 on paper, but that is a totally different formation because Dembele is not a CM in 442 but a true winger-attacker.
We basically played 432 with Dembele somewhere on the field.
So, it was way closer to 433 than to 442.
Or, it was way closer to a 3men midfield than to a EV's classical 4men midfield.
Oh ok. Then you should distinguish it by saying 4-4-2 with CM's or workhorse 4-4-2.
And it was actually closer to a 4-2-3-1, because Iniesta played wide on the other end too, than a 4-3-3. I spoke about Dembélé not playing with a double pivot but I was basically laughed at. His coach from Rennes said something similar. You also pointed out something similar regarding him and Coutinho previously...
And I will agree that we played better with 4 CM's than this tripe that Valverde has going now but 4 CM's leave you with a lack of attacking width. With the squad we have I still maintain that a 4-3-3 should be our go to formation because you still have some semblance of a midfield as well as width. If not then the purchases of Coutinho and Dembélé would have been for nothing. They can't play in a workhorse 4-4-2...