21 - Frenkie de Jong

[Barcaman]

Me on other hand already tipsy at that point. L

My wallet envies you.

 

[Masetro10]

Better at the 10 role than Pedri low key 😅

 

[FCMessi]

65 mil and Man U can have him.

 

[TheStig]

Our new #10!

 

[Skalman]

He is back! oh yes he is!

 

[HanDW]

 

[vinni]

I read this interviewa while back. It seems his ancle will take some time to recover even if he plays

MSN

 

[jairzinho]

65 mil and Man U can have him.

We missed out. Tan Haag's gone.

 

[Birdy]

And until now he did exactly that without any problem and it's nothing wrong with that. I also don't want my employer reduces my wage and I want to continue my job. Do I want to have my cake and eat it too?

Now finally situation changed because of the rise of other midfielders but even now he's just one injury away from starting again.

I want him to leave but I also wouldn't throw away money that's promised to me. It's not his fault that criminal Bartomeu gave him this wage and Laporta loves his pal who put us in this situation. He can thank him next time he's hugging those criminal and inviting them to clubs events and not bitch at Frenkie. The fault is totally on Laporta's pal Bartomeu.

WTF is this post mate?
Your 'analogy' fails all logic

If you don't do your job properly, your boss will fire you
If your boss thinks that you underperform given your wages, they will fire you
You can't have your cake and eat it too, because you don't hold all cards.
You actually might be holding very weak cards compared to your boss.

Club cannot kick Frenkie and every underperforming player out.
That's the crucial difference.
The best club can do is mount pressure on them via various avenues, and the last resort is individual training block them from playing games.
Simple as that

You can do better than that

PS: Please cut the BS about 'throwing away money given to him'.
Everybody in the club took advantage of an idiot that was running the club before.
Regime changed, practices changed, wages changed (although still very high IMO)
If a player doesn't get that, then he should not be part of the future of the club anyway

 

[Birdy]

A goal as a sub in a done and dusted game doesn't change shit

He should still go.

My claim for petition still stands:

@Barcaman @Andresito

Petition to change the name of the thread to '21 - Frenkie De Fraud'

 

[FinBarcelonafan]

I am glad he got points. Now we can milk United for ten or fifteen more millions.

 

[TheStig]

Frenkie does his job, I never once heard he missed a training or do anything unprofessional. Until his injuries he was a starter for years and one of our best midfielders. We can't say he didn't do his job even if he never justified all the money invested in him.

PS: Please cut the BS about 'throwing away money given to him'.
Everybody in the club took advantage of an idiot that was running the club before.
Regime changed, practices changed, wages changed (although still very high IMO)
If a player doesn't get that, then he should not be part of the future of the club anyway

It doesn't work like that, he has a valid legal contract. He doesn't have to change anything if he doesn't want to but seems you can't accept that so we can agree to disagree. We agree in fundamentals, I also want FDJ gone but I don't think he did anything wrong and I understand if he milks this until 2026 even if I don't like it.

 

[Messi983]

Haters gonna hate, Ding Dong delivers.

 

[Birdy]

Frenkie does his job, I never once heard he missed a training or do anything unprofessional. Until his injuries he was a starter for years and one of our best midfielders. We can't say he didn't do his job even if he never justified all the money invested in him.



It doesn't work like that, he has a valid legal contract. He doesn't have to change anything if he doesn't want to but seems you can't accept that so we can agree to disagree. We agree in fundamentals, I also want FDJ gone but I don't think he did anything wrong and I understand if he milks this until 2026 even if I don't like it.

He was never 'one of our best midfielders' because he has always underperformed, be it with Valverde Koeman Setien Xavi, you name it

I did not talk about his contract being invalid.
I said that kind of mentality and attitude does not belong.
That is enough of a reason to sell him.

 

[TheStig]

He was never 'one of our best midfielders' because he has always underperformed, be it with Valverde Koeman Setien Xavi, you name it

I did not talk about his contract being invalid.
I said that kind of mentality and attitude does not belong.
That is enough of a reason to sell him.

He underperformed but he was still one of our best midfielders, probably the best in the last 5 years altogether. Not because he was so good but because other were worse or inconsistent.

What mentality? He trains normally, he's a professional and he was a starter and one of the pillars of the team for years until the recent injuries happened. I still don't see what he is doing wrong. He's not (yet) some Lenglet/Umtiti to leach the club, get high salary and not play for years and even they didn't really do anything wrong, it's Laporta's pal's fault that those things happened, not the players.

If my employer offered me 10x wage than my current one I would take it in a second, I wouldn't say that to high for my abilities.