19m for Vermaelen isn't a fair price. We would've done better not getting a CB at all.
Wants out, last year of contract, injury prone, bench player with 7 starts (due to other players injured) last season, injured right now. 19m sounds about right
Uhm, what?Rubbish article, that guy has some sort of problem with Barca. Vermaelen was not sure he would get playing time at Barca and that is why he was hesitant to sign. Arsenal let him go, but lets see how smart a move that was.
Vermaelen is a really good defender that can help out the squad, we are desparate for CD'S and everyone knows it so overpaying was always going to happen. Now we have got new defenders that should help us out in negotiations next summer.
It's only 15m pounds. It's a price where if he flops it's not significant.
20M for Mathieu seems like a steal when you pay 19M for a player like Vermaelen. FFS19m euros? Wtf... For 13m it was acceptable, but 19m? Wenger making a fool out of Zubi and co again. Jesus.
Lovren is 10 times better
I still remember how I mentioned Lovren in the transfer-section some weeks ago and it got laughed off because not Barca-quality. But hey, at least we got VermaelenLovren is 10 times better
Rakitic was average at Schalke too, players improve.No. I watched him during his time in Lyon.
This guy is average, you have no reason to over-rate him.
When Lovren was average in Lyon, Vermaelen was injuredNo. I watched him during his time in Lyon.
This guy is average, you have no reason to over-rate him.