24 - Thomas Vermaelen

JamDav1982

Senior Member
psg didn't even try
man utd are trying to sign hummels
city could do without over bidding for them because they at least have a functioning defense, same for Chelsea

we on the other hand need as much people as we can get, and I'd rather sign a top class player for 50m (which none of these teams have big for those two) than 40 and these two, especially verms

Why did PSG not even try?

Man City are signing Mangala for around 40m and Chelsea have more than enough funds to pay 40/50m for a defender if they thought they were enough of an upgrade. Chelseas defence is not that great.

Those players are not out of reach to pay 40/50m for any of the clubs that were looking for CBs.

Why should Barca 'over bid' for those players if can get a functioning defence for less and with player that allow a more flexible formation?
 

jamrock

Senior Member
Why did PSG not even try?

Man City are signing Mangala for around 40m and Chelsea have more than enough funds to pay 40/50m for a defender if they thought they were enough of an upgrade. Chelseas defence is not that great.

Those players are not out of reach to pay 40/50m for any of the clubs that were looking for CBs.

Why should Barca 'over bid' for those players if can get a functioning defence for less and with player that allow a more flexible formation?

then that simply means city already have their 40m defender who they think fit their system, so no need for two

Chelsea's defense is at least function, if jose thought his defense was poor, we all know he would address it

yes psg didn't even try, they are too busy, trying to build a all Brazilian back four.

its not even Mathieu, as much as verms, its like when ever we run out of ideas we run to pick a player off arsenal, who comes had a few good games, but overall during their stay, NO doubt fails.

with better scouting we could sign someone better, for the same amount, and don't ask me who, because I am not a half a billion dollar club with near endless resources, as it relates to football
 

JamDav1982

Senior Member
then that simply means city already have their 40m defender who they think fit their system, so no need for two

Chelsea's defense is at least function, if jose thought his defense was poor, we all know he would address it

yes psg didn't even try, they are too busy, trying to build a all Brazilian back four.

its not even Mathieu, as much as verms, its like when ever we run out of ideas we run to pick a player off arsenal, who comes had a few good games, but overall during their stay, NO doubt fails.

with better scouting we could sign someone better, for the same amount, and don't ask me who, because I am not a half a billion dollar club with near endless resources, as it relates to football

Man City have chosen a defender that suits their system ahead of Benatia/Hummels? Maybe that is Barcas thinking also then.

Chelse have a 'functioning defence' and dont have to 'over bid' for Bentia or Hummels? In that case Barca can forget about over bidding if they can buy a functioning defence for less. Which is what they have tried to do.

You put up excuses about other clubs not wanting to over pay 40/50m for Benatia/Hummels as it doesnt suit their system or have a functioning defence. But for Barca you almost demand they pay 40/50m for these players regardless.
 

Tomchin

New member
Medical already finished more than 1 hour ago, and still no official news. You have to wonder whether they detected something during the medical after all.
 

PaulFCB

Banned
I think you guys can't see the good part, we're actually starting to have a legit defense.
We don't need the best defense, we never had the best defensive line-up anyway. These players ( Thomas, Jeremy ) aren't the best, but they're way better in a line-up that what we lined up till now, not to mention games when we had to improvise.
We rate them in a way, but I think they can both be our best 2 central defenders if we look at Pique, wonder where we would rate him if he was playing at Valencia or Arsenal and he would be on our transfer list.
We just need defenders, and as long as they're in good form, I believe we fixed our problem of not having one at all, we can finally stop sweating all game thinking of what happens on an average counter by the other team while Messi, Neymar and more newly Suarez pack their team around their box.
Of course, it would've been ideal to have a Mats Hummels but I don't think it's 100% necessary we need the best of the best to achieve something these following seasons.

And Agger? Please no, never liked the rumors, plus, I think 15m quid is OK for Thomas, we actually took advantage of another club trying to transfer one, we hijacked a player after another club was the one making pressures for it's current club to let go.
 

PaulFCB

Banned
TV deal to break and we sign Mussachio. ONE CAN DREAM :xavi:

We can get Mussachio in 2 years from Spuds :xavi:.

PS: In our case, I think we need experienced defenders, this proved efficient against us so many times, I think it's one of the main attributes a defender needs to have a top club in important games with much pressure.
 

Behrox

Vice President of FC Barcelona
We can get Mussachio in 2 years from Spuds :xavi:.

PS: In our case, I think we need experienced defenders, this proved efficient against us so many times, I think it's one of the main attributes a defender needs to have a top club in important games with much pressure.
Levy :surrender:
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top