You are talking about the 20 minutes he played as a substitute with Vidal? You are clinging to 20 minutes as a sub when we were two goals up already! Its total madness to start knee jerk reactions comparing Coutinho to Messi, Eto'o and Ronaldinho based on those minutes were he did nothing special. He didnt play with Iniesta and Dembele today either. Paco simply replaced Vidal. So when Vidal played it was "awesome" and Messi comparisons were made. And when Paco replaced Vidal as today, you think Coutinho ruins everything and he is a big burden. Its just going from one extreme to another.
[MENTION=22413]Ousmane Dembélé[/MENTION] asked the same thing.
Coutinho played in his first match in this lineup, where everything worked well (even though for only 25 minutes):
Suarez-Messi
Coutinho-Rakitic-Busquets-Paulinho
This is classical EV's 442 with 2 workhorses+Busquets and 1 playmaker (Iniesta/Coutinho).
So, from seen till now this season:
1. when Barca plays 442 with Iniesta and workhorses, we are usually awesome
2. when we change to 433 or 442 with with less workhorses, we are not THAT good usually
About Coutinho:
1. he played awesome, although in a small sample, when Barca played it's best EV's 442 with 2 workhorses (Rakitic-Paulinho/Gomes)
2. in all other matches, Coutinho played in either some 433s, or as a RW or in some formations with 3 attacking players infront of him, like today: Messi, Suarez, Paco
Um.... He didn't play with Iniesta or Dembele today either....
The same reply for Ousmane.
Cou played awesome, when Barca played in it's best formation from 2017/18 season.
Jombi, back to your post, about a part where I said Coutinho ruins everything:
Well, my opinion is that we had a nice working machine prior to January.
If you want to put Coutinho in the team, he should play in Iniesta's spot and Iniesta needs to be benched.
But EV wants to play both of them.
In that sense, Cou is a problem since we hadn't that problem in December.
If Iniesta will get benched, Coutinho won't be a problem, since we'll be able to play our 442 with Cou-Busi-Raki-Paulinho.
But, not only that we need to bench Iniesta to make our team working again, we also need to bench Dembele.
As I have wrote above, I am a fan of EV's 442 with good balance and strong defense.
If you put Cou and Iniesta on a field together=that is not anymore EV's balanced 442.
If you put Cou at Iniesta's position and Dembele on a right, that is also quite a different formation from EV's balanced 442.
So, to some extent:
= we can't play BOTH Coutinho and Dembele and play EV's balanced 442.
We can play it only with Iniesta and Dembele on a bench.
If you want to play both Coutinho and Dembele, then we'll need to find some new formation and spend months of testing whether it can work.
... and that is exactly what are we doing now.
Let's hope that our advantage over AM and other clubs will be big enough until we either:
1. find a formation to fit all these players
2. or until we will give up from tests and go back to basics (EV's 442)
So, I'll write my opinion one more time:
= let's go back to EV's 442 right away, and:
1. either bench Iniesta and Dembele
2. or bench Coutinho and Dembele and put them into matches in the 2nd half
For now, all these combinations are causing problems:
1. moving away from EV's 442
2. playing both Iniesta and Coutinho
3. playing both Iniesta, Coutinho and Dembele
4. playing both Coutinho and Dembele
(The sample is small in some combinations, but still...)
We have Messi, Suarez, Iniesta, Dembele and Couthino. Unrealistic to see them playing all together.
Imo: Couthino is the natural replacement of Iniesta (34 y.o.), that will take place in stages
In your opinion, wihch 11 with these metionned players ?
As explained above...
Some will need to get benched.
Suarez-Messi
Iniesta/Coutinho-Busi-Raki-Paulinho/a random similar Cm