Don't think it would be blasphemous to consider selling him anymore.
I was thinking about that the other day, there are plenty of comments about selling him on reddit and twitter because we play better without him, but the same exact comments are made about Frenkie and same exact angry reactions from other fans.
Diving deeper into it, I think there are fair arguments in both sides.
-On one hand, we played actually better without both, we were
able to be faster, we were able to change pace and tempo in the game, got back the element of surprise.
The truth is, current midfield trio of Christensen, Gundogan and Fermin has different instinctive elements in it:
Christensen is pure destroyer, Gundogan is a controller of the game, pace, Fermin is an attacking midfielder who attacks space in opponents penalty area.
Each one does his job perfectly, Gundogan is allowed to be the sole controller of the game and he is like a coach on the pitch, without Pedri or De Jon interfering, Fermin is the goal scoring midfielder which is something that Xavi wanted to have from the start, and foolishly tried to change Pedri into one when it isn't his game.
Both Pedri and Frenkie are more of controller or b2b, both slow the game down. Frenkie keep the ball too much, Pedri wants to play in slower tempo. It is easier to become lethargic with those 2.
-On the other hand, from pure individual ability, only Gundogan is superior midfielder to those 2 players, Gavi is a level below and Fermin is even a level lower. What we have seen is a small sample size without them, and it was mostly against teams that won't sit deep against us, and wasn't that great in first place.
There is also a question of coaching, was Xavi the guy to get the best out of those 2? Is someone else capable of getting the best out of those 2? It is a fair question although I don't agree it is the case.
There is also the question of other factors, when those 2 were out 3 other things that helped the team happened:
1-Ter Stegen is back, and actually back in form. Having a good GK is essential factor.
2-Raphinha is back, and he is statistically our best G/A per minutes in the team. Our best and quickest attacker who moves the most without the ball. Giving us more option in attack.
3-Cubarsi emerging, and while I have question marks about his defense, he is undeniably the best passing CB since at least Marquez (and might be even better) and this is helping the team to get out of the back better, in a way it makes the need of a midfielder dropping back and being the carrier a redundant trait.
And we can add a 4th factor, which is Christensen doing a 5/10 job as DM, which helps the team well, it is better than anything we had in the position this year.
_________________________________________
But for me, I think what is clear is that while I don't think that either is the issue,
I think that both Pedri and De Jong are simply not working well together, that we need to break this duo.
Sometimes in football that math isn't equivalent to the total of quality, 10 + 10 sometimes get you 30 and other times it equals 12 depending on the fit and the team dynamics. Both Pedri and De Jong are quality players but you don't get the best of them by putting them together, it makes things more complicated than it needs to be, it makes us slower and more predictable. One has to leave.
And the decision to sell one of them, needs to come from upper management, from Deco specifically, because a new coach is most likely to repeat Xavi mistake, he will want to keep his best players and try to make it work. Coaches usually have this ego thing of thinking they are the gods who can make their ideas work and they can change players.
It is also the easiest way to get some relief financially, and be able to improve other positions without weakening the team much in other areas, if we can sell one of both and get a CDM, LW, that is a Win. That will be done with selling, loaning deadweights and registering Roque, Fermin and signing back back up GK and Cancelo.
_____________
Now which one should be sold?
That is the tougher part.
Pedri has the bigger potential tbh, and Frenkie is currently the better player and the more reliable one. Frenkie is also our only midfielder who is in his prime and fairly athletic and physical. Both has contract until 2026 and contract talks should start soon.
I am leaning toward selling Pedri tbh, it is too risky as he might fulfil his potential elsewhere, but I believe it is always difficult to develop several players of the same age at the same time. Gavi, Pedri and Fermin won't last long together.
This will be a decision that should have the input of the coach and will also depend on the market.
His value declined a lot though between injuries, poor form, lack of end product and subpar physique. Doubt anyone comes knocking at 90m or so. He'd be dead in EPL's pace and physicality, bar playing for City.
I'd still keep him than sell him for 40-50m.
If a team paid 50M for Dembele at 26 with his injuries then Pedri at 21 should get us closer to 90 than to 50M.
Especially if Lucho stays with PSG, they will be the main contender to get him if we sell.