BBZ8800
Senior Member
We probably can't sign Thiago and besides him i don't really see a midfielder that would fit us perfectly. People here like Eriksen but he's more a AM type and will probably cost like 100M. Maybe Pjanic but idk, probably very expensive too.
Rabiot is a decent player, not the worst to get for the midfield. But i would only go for him if he's a steal because of 1 year contract and PSG needing to sell. And also if he doesn't want a giant salary. If this ends up costing us 40M and 7M net per year it's not worth it. If its half of that? Yeah could be worth a try but i doubt that'll happen.
We paid 35-40M for Arthur, who will (at best) need at least 2-3-4 years to get to current Rabiot's level.
Comparison:
1. Rabiot is only 16 Months older than Arthur
2. Rabiot played 5 full seasons for Psg (131 league matches). Arthur played 0 minutes in Europe
3. Rabiot is playing in Champions league for 5 years, since the age 18. He played 31 CL matches already.
4. Rabiot played 6 NT matches for France. Arthur played 0 matches for Brasil.
More or less, Rabiot wins in every single stat.
Yet, people will reply: but Arthur is "exactly" what we need and he deserves a chance.
Yet, a guy with 5 years of 1st division and Champions league don't deserve it, for the same money.
MTL, this is not about you, but my general reply.
I think that someone even mentioned that Rabiot is not young anymore.
Ouch. He is 1 year and 4 months older than Arthur.
AND: He is 3 Months YOUNGER than Sergi Samper
If we ask our fans about Samper and his Barca's future, people will say: he is young, he deserves a chance, he can improve a lot.
Yet, Rabiot, who is younger than Samper and played 5 full years for Psg, is "too old" and not worth a risk and developing.
My estimation: people are biased towards La Masia guys and Barca's DNA players (Arthur).