In my eyes, Rabiot is currently a better midfielder than all our guys.
It depends how each of us rate a player.
You see, on Barca's forum, Thiago Alcantara is a top5 midfielder in the world.
Yet, in Bayern's eyes, he is their 3rd choice or something like that.
On Barca's forum, Arthur is the best young prospect.
For the rest of the world, it is: who the f is Arthur, lol?
On Barca's forum, Arthur is miles better than Rabiot.
For the rest of the world, half of big teams would sign Rabiot right away, while for Arthur, they would reply: lol, who?
So, our forum has an idea and a dream how Arthur's current technical skills will develop into some sort of a Xavi's successor.
I have told numerous times, my estimation is that Arthur will be a classical fail.
So, if Arthur doesn't develop anymore, he will need 3-4 years to get to a playable level for Europe.
For Rabiot, if he doesn't improve even 1% anymore, he will still be better than almost all of our current midfielders.
So, you see, guys here are putting all their hopes into "but he has potential and he can improve" area.
So, the idea is that Arthur has good starting skills and that he will improve and develop a lot here.
While with Rabiot, guys don't like his type of skills, plus guys don't believe that he will improve anymore.
And yet, Rabiot in only 1 year older than Arthur and is for example, younger than Samper, who is here considered as a hot prospect, who can improve a lot.
So, again, Samper, Arthur and other guys can improve and develop, but Rabiot's development is finished.
More or less, Rabiot is on a verge of a retirement
I don't even want to ask questions like: if Arthur is soooo good, why other teams didn't buy him?
We will hear classical Mundo Deportivo's brainwash answer: he wanted to play only for Barca.
Or, if he is that good, why wasn't he picked for an NT WC squad, yet Paulinho and Renato were? And yet, Paulinho can barely pass the ball, lol.
I mean, I don't even want to ask those questions, because a brain of an average Arthur's fan here will explode while writing crazy alibies and explanations.
So, when you sum it all, there are tons of indications that Arthur is ok, yet meh for a world class level and that Barca's forum is living in their own dreamland, as always.
Yet, Rabiot, who is 5x times more developed and proven player RIGHT NOW is considered as a bad player.
People here are always obsessed with "potential" and with risks and lottery.
So, for me, Rabiot vs Arthur, I would put my money on Rabiot that he will be a better player in 5 years, both for Barca or any top team.
For now, anything indicates in that direction.
Arthur is dominating Brasilian league, and yet a coach picked Paulinho over him.
If he were the next Xavi, coaches would have discovered his amazing talent long, long before.
Not to mention that they see him every week in a Brasilian league.
so, he is a safer bet that he will turn into a world class or at least into a useful player.
His set of skills if far from Andre Gomes.
Rabiot can dribble, play forward passes, score and make tackles.
More or less, everything what Gomes can't.
If he'll suck, he will fail.
If he will be as good as you guys are dreaming, he will earn enough of European and a CL's experience somewhere around 2022-2023, more or less.