[MENTION=20930]Messi983[/MENTION]
well, that's a well elaborated post you got there Buddy , i agree with most parts of it. the words offensive-deffensive are too much open to interpretation , let's set a premise here , by offensive i mean a possession oriented type of football , based on slow to medium paced attacks and not fast counter attacking (a defensive set up based primarily on counter attacks-fast transition- minimal of possession)
having set the premise here, i do agree with what you say about Chile and Italy , when i say defensive set up , by no means i mean it's not solid or anything like that, i was geniunely surprised by Italy in the euros and i even rooted for them , we are on the same page here. same thing about Chile.
well i kinda refreshed my memory , i do remember Liverpool playing a lot of 3-4-3 and they domolished Barca with that set up , it allowed Riise to lunch non stop assaults at our goal when we faced them in 2007 and i reckon they did the same thing against real Madrid when they demolished them in a great fashion in 2009 4-0 with the defensive 3-4-3 ( again by defensive i mean , minimal possession - fast transition - fast execution of attacks ) .. Liverpool were simply rock solid and their record during that period speak for itself , 2 finals in 3 years.
Now to Barcelona , here our opinions differ , i'm an idealist , i believe in football identity, there is a reason why Liverpool aren't a powerhouse anymore and we are , it's a bout building something sustainable and establishing a dynasty , the blueprint is there , it's to play 4-3-3 ( yes with all the variations you mentioned except the last paragraph , there where i disagree ) .. i truly belive that if we continue to believe in our ideology ( so far we are doing it ), football giants around us will keep having their ups and downs , while we'll still be here forever at the top of the hierarchy . that's a personal belief