i mind your avatar and realize why you're so... touchy. perhaps if iniesta was injured without lucho knowing it, it would've been wrong for him to ask the coach not play him, because he is a professional athlete who is contractually obligated to play even if he is doing it horribly. or maybe if it were a physical problem you would justify this kind of action, but for me it's the same, whether it's a physical problem or a mental one, whatever's going on with iniesta. and for me there would be nothing wrong with him asking lucho for some time to clear his head. you really have strict and dogmatic views on player/coach relationship. and what's this imaginary scenario from the last season that isn't even related to what i'm saying.
you're wrong about me wanting to see silky iniesta, although that would be great, but at this point i only want to see him helping the team not hurting it. is he instructed to play like crap? because that's how he's playing. and why doesn't the same "instructed" logic apply to alves or any other player who doesn't deliver for the team and get crucified for it on a weekly basis?
here's my final opinion on this whether you like it or not, iniesta is playing like total crap, and many people see it, and many people get butthurt because they can't accept it. but there would be nothing wrong to see iniesta sit out for 4-5 weeks straight even if it were his own choice. if iniesta himself announced that he wants to take some time off, no one would even think that it meant going against the coach.
alves > iniesta
oh, touchy doesn't even begin to describe it, i'm livid with rage here, you know. especially the last remark really got to me, not gonna lie.
The problem with your argument is that you equate "i personally think iniesta is playing like total crap" with "iniesta playing is hurting the team"
we've just had 11 wins in a row, had one of the statistically best seasons so far and are on course in all three title races. Now you might be saying, yeah but that's despite iniesta playing like crap, but luckily, thanks to luchos obsession with rotations, we can debunk that. No midfield without iniesta has been a revelation. Despite his "decline" and whatnot he can apparently fulfill the role that lucho expects of his midfielders better than the current alternatives. And that's that.
I have no problem with people saying he's has declined or is a shadow of what he was, because the way he plays now is dull and unimpressive. But that's not down to motivation or decline or magical loss of ability, or anything else that could be cured by the "pique treatment". that's why your statement is so ridiculous, among other things.
but we can make a bet if you like. Let's wait till spring when spain plays their qualifiers again and if iniesta plays equally "crappy" as with barca this season, i eat my words and use a stalin picture as my avatar for the rest of the year. sounds fair, eh?