Sorin
Well-known member
tbh that isn't the case in Spain. The release clause isn't related to the buying club.
It is about labour movement and the ability to leave working place for fair compensation, it is actually a labour law and not a football one.
For that, the player is the one who was actually paying the release clause, not the buying club. And prior to 2016 that caused problems because those money that club pays was considered income and therefore was taxed
Ok it still doesn't change anything. Rarely do players have the money to pay their release clauses so the buying clubs are always involved. For that there must be contact between the buying club and the player representatives(agent, lawyer etc.) before the actual payment is done at the league hq.
This is a cut and dry case. Does Atletico have proof of a legalized document between Barca and Griezmann's camp that atests to the definitive agreement between parts from before the 1st of July? If they do then fair enough, they are entitled to another 80m. If they don't have that and only have proof of both parties just talking about a possible deal, then they are shit out of luck.
Last edited: