He wanted a permanent transfer I think and the money offered was not bad for an unproven teenager.
Unlikely he will ever be good enough for Barca.
Roma was willing to pay his buyout clause actually . we had no option & no leverage but to sell him .we just negotiated higher money so they don't pay tax and everybody win .
We got his money,bought a better prospect (Halilovic) and let Sandro & munir get bigger opportunities .not so bad
His buy out was around 12m, Barca got around 4.5m for him and incentives of around 7.5m and future percentage of fee.
If they were willing to pay the 12m Barca would have been better off taking that and the guaranteed cash at the time.
Arsenal were linked as well. Dont think either were willing to go anywhere close to paying his buy out clause.
It'd done & dusted but never really lost faith in Sanabria's talent - glad to see him playing well in La Liga. At the time this saga was going on, many pointed to Munir as being the better option down the road - between the two, which would you prefer?
If I am not mistaken he left our B team because of not having enough playing time, if that is true why would he want to come and join us in the first team knowning he will not have a lot of playing time?