You might be right, I just thought it was a 24M€ buyout, so if you paid that amount, everyone would get the share they were entitled to, and no-one could do anything about it, and only the player would decide if he wanted to go. Are brazilian buyouts more complicated than that? Of course there is wages, but I don't really buy that - how much more could he get at City.. All that aside, I know it pose a problem if he only could play from January, but if we wanted him long term we could have done better, IMO.
So now it's Gabigol, or we will miss all of our forward targets this summer. We should not lose him also!
He scored 26 for Besiktas. I know, weaker league, but he did it
He's better than Mandzo or Gignac.
26!? Not bad. As you said it is much weaker league, I am not sure if he is better than Mandzukic too. Lets see, he was quality once upon a time.
Debatable with Mandzukic, Gignac I agree.
He chose city because they paid more. GJ had a 3rd party ownership, and Palmeiras and his agents had the majority of his rights, and convinced him to go to the highest bidder.
I'm starting to warm up to the Mario Gomez option if he comes on a loan. He speaks Spanish so won't have any issues adapting and he brings something different to the table, and most importantly, he won't stand in the way for the likes of Munir, Mujica or any potential young CF signing.
It's a good strategic move as it'll allow the club to judge the options we have and explore other options in the market next year instead of spending money for the sake of it right now.