the thing people dont get is that we are signing another forward no matter what. Munir only stays if we fail to sign, Alcacer or Luan. the question isnt if munir should stay and we shouldnt sign alcacer. is we dont sign Alcacer we will spend that money on Luan and Munir will still go on loan. this is also in the best interest of Munir.
Wolfsburg just signed Mario Gomez for 7m euros.
How were we not all over this type of deal? Would have ben a great option short term and would have allowed us to show Munir our confidence in him by allowing him to go out on loan and know that there would be a spot for him if he developed well.
Because it wouldnt fix the problem, just prospone it. Gomez wouldnt have been a potential replacement for Suarez, we would be hoping Munir develops up to that standard quickly because Gomez can only last so long as a replacement.
Alcacer is a better buy than Gomez for us right now.
People complaining about the fee, we are buying Valencia's captain, he is also an international , knows La Liga , is a striker and is 22 years old. If Valencia hadnt had a horrible season, they would have asked us to pay his release clause or fuck off. 30m is within our budget and i'd rather spend it on Alcacer than 25m on fucking Luan.
Its not like we didnt try with Munir as our only MSN backup, we did last season and he didnt get enough game time. People say they trust Munir , thats all great and all but are you really thinking about his development? You think he is happy playing 825 minutes a season? He had 8 apperances last season, there is no way he will continue to grow and become a potential Suarez replacement with those kind of minutes.