Yannik
Senior Member
There's evidence. The evidence isn't rigorous? Sure, because there's no systematic (scientific) method of evaluating this.
What Bayern has over Barca:
1) Early European cup success and 1 more CL (although Barca did play in CL finals before Bayern AFAIK. Nevertheless, history remembers winners)
2) Better CL KO record, although part of this is a function of being involved in more tournaments (prior to the rule change) due to being the de facto best team in Germany.
3) Better H2H record if you want to include that
What Barca has over Bayern
1) CL finals wins v Manchester United x 2 and Juventus
2) More impressive trebles
3) More Ballon d'Or Winners and better cast of legends
4) The 09-11 side is considered by more football managers (e.g., SAF, Wenger) and players and less importantly, fans, as one of the best club sides of all time. The only names I've seen along with them are Milan 80s, Ajax 70s, RM 50s, and sometimes ZZ's RM.
5) The difference in CLs in 1. But 4 of our titles have come in a tougher, "modern" era while Bayern has 3 in the same.
6) 26 League titles v Real Madrid, who is the best club of all time.
Stuff like "more impressive trebles" or "tougher era" is just vibes. And quite frankly: I think sides from early 2000s looked great back then, but would shit the bed today. Everything in the sport gradually improves with every decade passing: Speed, strength, nutrition, medicine, tactic, technology, analytics etc
Last edited: