silky_soccer
Fireman Sam
Agreed, ignore him.
Yeah its a hard one, Lippi won the WC under exceptional circumstances and brought great success at club level. While Trapattoni bombed at International level, but had greater success at club. I guess it comes back to my point about influence on how the game is played rather than just taken on merits of trophies won. And in that respect I would say Trapattoni, he gave the catenaccio school of thought its purpose in the modern era, and was the influence on Lippi even. I guess what makes me shy from saying they were the very best is that they slightly innovated on an already well established idea of football to gain success. And any greatness they did have in making that innovation is ultimately undone by a strict adherence to it and becoming tactical dinosaurs, too stubborn to move the tactics and style on - see Lippi in the last WC.
Agreed if decided to take that stance with him..
Yeah it was Lippi's success on the international scene that made me chose him, but i never really took that into consideration, how they influence the game, I suppose if you're going from that view Trappatoni would be there.
Cruyff would have to be up there aswell in that regard, he revolutionised attacking football with Ajax and particuarly Barca