Champions league 09-10

[diegomessi]

In my opinion there is nothing here, the def didn't wanted to passed it to the keeper.
If you give freekick on this...Damn, we're gonna see freekick each times a defender counter a shot, tackles, etc etc

he poked it with his toe... it went back to the keeper... he was pretty much alone with the ball if this isnt a backpass then what is

 

[Valon]

Gneg

 

[diegomessi]

and even more blame on vermalen for not paying more attention he is just as much at fault

 

[Do0m]

mayn, it is a pass back if the defender touches it. thats why, when you shield away the ball, you ought to be careful that you dont touch it so the goalkeeper can gather it. campbell and fabianski messed up hard and ref just followed the rule book, nothing wrong in that.

Yes he touched it (very few), but do you see a pass in this ? I don't.
If there is freekick each time the def just touch it, then a keeper can't no more handle a shot wich is counter by a def.

 

[House of Flies]

Yes he touched it (very few), but do you see a pass in this ? I don't.
If there is freekick each time the def just touch it, then a keeper can't no more handle a shot wich is counter by a def.

if the direction of the ball is altered by the touch of the foot then it is a pass. i do see a pass in this because sol campbell repeatedly touched the ball. you are confusing deflections of shots with passing now which is not going to bode well for you.

 

[diegomessi]

Yes he touched it (very few), but do you see a pass in this ? I don't.
If there is freekick each time the def just touch it, then a keeper can't no more handle a shot wich is counter by a def.

this a lil diff then a deflection he was facing the keeper with the ball in front of him it was rolling un challenged to the keeper and he "touched it" but it helped it along its way look im not a porto fan im not an arsenal fan, but from the second i saw it i knew it wouldbe called bc it was by def a back pass

 

[Cule Angles]

Clear backpass, you can even see Campbell gesture at Fabianski as the keeper is picking it up. Big Gay Sol knew it was a backpass, the goal was totally legit

 

[House of Flies]

Clear backpass, you can even see Campbell gesture at Fabianski as the keeper is picking it up. Big Gay Sol knew it was a backpass, the goal was totally legit

Apart from the gay part, CA speaks the truth.

 

[Gnegneri]

Gneg

I know, right?


But no love from DoOm it seems. Pity.

 

[Do0m]

Ah-ah-ah. Don't change it now, it was about watching the goal and you made your point in full-blown capitals. I never said anything if it was correct or not.



You want HD, you get HD:

Can you still say he didn't see the goal?

Liar.
I found the real image :

 

[House of Flies]

BAHAHA! this is ridic amusing.

 

[Gnegneri]

The real image that has been made with "Adobe Photoshop CS4" in Windows?


Nicely done though. I see you're very productive at deflecting attention. You should try some discussions with beast!

 

[Do0m]

The real image that has been made with "Adobe Photoshop CS4" in Windows?


Nicely done though. I see you're very productive at deflecting attention. You should try some discussions with beast!

was just for run
Ok I give you the point that he turned his head back just before the free kick.
But it's not changing the facts.

1) Pass to the keeper ??? I don't think so (and i'm not english, and i'm not the only one surprised by this decision)
2) asking the ball to the keeper to pull it in the feet of Porto while the keeper is walking is like giving them a goal
3) the ref position is stopping the arsenal def

 

[Valon]

Who cares? ArseAnal lost!

 

[diegomessi]

was just for run
Ok I give you the point that he turned his head back just before the free kick.
But it's not changing the facts.

1) Pass to the keeper ??? I don't think so (and i'm not english, and i'm not the only one surprised by this decision)
2) asking the ball to the keeper to pull it in the feet of Porto while the keeper is walking is like giving them a goal
3) the ref position is stopping the arsenal def

ill guess ill have to agree to disagree... i just dont think that ref had any reason to want porto to win.. he was not terrible but botched calls both ways