Possession football isn't dead. 95 % of the time it's the way to go. But there is a clear blueprint against it now. 4-4-2, 2 banks of 4, wingers tucked inside, sitting deep, working hard against the ball and swarming out on the break. No idea how to counter it. That's not my job to figure out. Probably just do the same. Take out all passing midfielders, play 4 strikers and 2 physical DMs, give up possession and be direct. But then you got borefests like Atletico vs. Chelsea. Basically Mourinho has ruined football.
I know. I agree that Possession football isn't dead.
Against most of the Spanish teams and against most of European teams it is still good enough.
But I am happy that some other fans also see that it is dead against top teams who parks a bus.
Even the Barca from 2009 would have problems today because top teams today play better against Tiki-Taka then in 2009.
So, we shouldn't stop playing Tiki-Taka. We should play it in 90% of matches.
But against Real, Atletico, Chelsea, Bayern and other teams, we will lose in 2 matches.
Rijkaard broke Mourinho's Chelsea 2006 with some new tricks. He didn't play (all out attack) Possession football against Chelsea in 2006' (because he was "killed" on counterattacks in 2005, 4:2 at Stamford Bridge).
He played more physical midfield with Edmilson, Marquez, Van Bommel. And he gave some Possession to Chelsea.
Basically, he gave the ball to them and then they had to open slightly and they had to ruin their bus (since they had the ball). Then we had more spaces and scored Goals from semi-counterattacks.
Something like that (or some new tricks) should be done in the future. Playing how we played in the last 2-3 Seasons is not the way to go anymore in semifinals of CL against parked buses. Our current style is a road to ruin against any stronger team. (We can't score, and we will almost surely always concede 1 or 2 from counter-attacks)